vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.4M vs $208.8M, roughly 1.7× Bandwidth Inc.). INTERFACE INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs 1.9%, a 5.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bandwidth Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.1% vs 4.3%). INTERFACE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.6M vs $-1.0M). Over the past eight quarters, INTERFACE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 9.7%).
Bandwidth Inc. is a communications platform as a service company. It sells software application programming interfaces for voice, text messaging and emergency services, using its own global IP voice network.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
BAND vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $208.8M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $4.0M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | 37.3% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 60.5% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.1% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 200.0% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $208.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $207.7M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.9M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.0M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.2M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $210.0M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $193.9M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.6M | $346.6M |
| Q1 26 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.7M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $413.0K | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.6% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.5% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.8% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.0% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.4% | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.7% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | 60.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.5% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.27 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.3M | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $405.7M | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $984.2M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $47.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.4M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.1M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.7M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.8M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.4M | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M |
| Q1 26 | $405.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $400.0M | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.7M | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $384.5M | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.4M | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.5M | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $336.6M | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $307.4M | $451.2M |
| Q1 26 | $984.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $964.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $989.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.0M | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.5% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.6M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.7M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.5M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.5M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.4M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.0M |
| Q1 26 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.55× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.03× | 0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BAND
Segment breakdown not available.
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
