vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. (BBBY) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($394.6M vs $247.8M, roughly 1.6× BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.). Zeta Global Holdings Corp. runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs -6.6%, a 8.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.4% vs 6.9%). Zeta Global Holdings Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($60.9M vs $-12.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (42.3% CAGR vs -21.1%).
Bed Bath & Beyond was an American big-box retail chain specializing in housewares, furniture, and specialty items. Headquartered in Union, New Jersey, the chain operated stores in the United States and Canada, and was once counted among the Fortune 500 and the Forbes Global 2000. The chain filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April 2023 and liquidated all of its remaining stores, with the last closing on July 30, 2023. Following the retail chain's liquidation, its name was adopted by online ret...
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is an American marketing technology company which was founded in 2007. Zeta offers companies a suite of multichannel marketing tools focused on creating, maintaining, and monetizing customer relationships. The company went public on the New York Stock Exchange on June 10, 2021, at a US$1.7 billion valuation.
BBBY vs ZETA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $247.8M | $394.6M |
| Net Profit | $-16.4M | $6.5M |
| Gross Margin | 23.9% | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | 68.8% | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | -6.6% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.9% | 25.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 58.9% | -57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.24 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $247.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $273.4M | $394.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $257.2M | $337.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.3M | $308.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $231.7M | $264.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.2M | $314.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $311.4M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.1M | $227.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-16.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-20.9M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.5M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.3M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-39.9M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-81.3M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-61.0M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-42.6M | $-28.1M |
| Q1 26 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.6% | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.3% | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | 62.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.1% | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | 60.0% |
| Q1 26 | 68.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.4% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.0% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.5% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.8% | -11.7% |
| Q1 26 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.8% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.2% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.6% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.7% | -12.3% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.26 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.74 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.68 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.33 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $135.8M | $319.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $197.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $202.5M | $804.6M |
| Total Assets | $404.5M | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $135.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $175.3M | $319.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.4M | $385.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.6M | $365.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.6M | $364.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.2M | $366.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.4M | $418.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.2M | $154.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $197.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $196.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $196.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $184.4M |
| Q1 26 | $202.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $804.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $202.6M | $689.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $673.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.4M | $676.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.7M | $676.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.2M | $474.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $250.4M | $217.0M |
| Q1 26 | $404.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $363.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $402.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $428.3M | $869.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $496.8M | $583.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.85× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.8M | $64.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.8M | $60.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.2% | 15.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-24.8M | $185.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-11.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.5M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.1M | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.9M | $34.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.7M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-42.1M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-75.9M | $31.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-12.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.4M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $39.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.1M | $32.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.7M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-45.5M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-80.4M | $24.4M |
| Q1 26 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.2% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.2% | 10.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 3.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
