vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and GREAT SOUTHERN BANCORP, INC. (GSBC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($98.9M vs $56.4M, roughly 1.8× GREAT SOUTHERN BANCORP, INC.). GREAT SOUTHERN BANCORP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 28.9% vs 5.4%, a 23.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GREAT SOUTHERN BANCORP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.2% vs -3.2%). GREAT SOUTHERN BANCORP, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($70.1M vs $1.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.8% CAGR vs 4.5%).
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. is a leading provider of concrete pumping services and equipment rental solutions across the U.S. and U.K. It serves core construction segments including infrastructure, commercial real estate development, and residential building, supporting efficient, safe concrete placement for projects of all sizes.
U.S. Bancorp is an American multinational banking institution headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota and incorporated in Delaware. It is the 5th-largest bank in the United States as of 2025. As the largest bank in the Midwestern United States, it is considered systemically important by the Financial Stability Board. It is the parent company of its primary operating entity, U.S. Bank National Association, which does business as U.S. Bank. The company provides banking, investment, mortgage, tr...
BBCP vs GSBC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $98.9M | $56.4M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $16.3M |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 34.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.4% | 28.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.2% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.6% | 9.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.09 | $1.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $98.9M | $56.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.2M | $57.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.2M | $59.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.0M | $55.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.1M | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.6M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.7M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.0M | $51.6M |
| Q4 25 | $5.3M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0K | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.6M | $17.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $16.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $13.4M |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 34.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 38.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 41.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 38.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | 31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 36.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 32.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.0% | 33.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.4% | 30.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.3% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.09 | $1.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $1.56 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $1.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $1.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $1.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $1.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $1.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $44.4M | $189.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $417.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $264.8M | $636.1M |
| Total Assets | $879.5M | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.58× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $44.4M | $189.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $196.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.8M | $245.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.1M | $217.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.0M | $195.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.3M | $208.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $186.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.7M | $171.4M |
| Q4 25 | $417.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $417.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $417.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $373.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $372.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $372.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $264.8M | $636.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.3M | $632.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.8M | $622.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.7M | $613.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $321.7M | $599.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.7M | $612.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.3M | $568.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $307.9M | $565.2M |
| Q4 25 | $879.5M | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $886.0M | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $878.8M | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $912.9M | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $898.0M | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $890.8M | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $894.7M | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $894.8M | $5.8B |
| Q4 25 | 1.58× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.5M | $81.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.9M | $70.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.9% | 124.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.7% | 20.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.72× | 5.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $17.5M | $121.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.5M | $81.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $39.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.4M | $44.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.0M | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.3M | $-26.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $70.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $191.0K | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.1M | $39.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $16.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $-27.7M |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 124.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 59.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | 69.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.2% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.9% | 74.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | -53.7% |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.7% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.72× | 5.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.16× | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 2.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.63× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.00× | 2.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BBCP
| US Concrete Pumping | $72.2M | 73% |
| US Concrete Waste Management Services | $21.3M | 22% |
| Other | $5.4M | 5% |
GSBC
Segment breakdown not available.
