vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BEASLEY BROADCAST GROUP INC (BBGI) and PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.5M vs $53.1M, roughly 1.4× BEASLEY BROADCAST GROUP INC). On growth, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.7% vs -21.2%). PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-4.4M). Over the past eight quarters, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc., based in Naples, Florida, is an owner/operator of radio stations in the United States. As of September 2025, the company owns 54 stations under the Beasley Media Group name.
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
BBGI vs PBYI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $53.1M | $75.5M |
| Net Profit | $-190.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | -433.6% | 22.7% |
| Net Margin | -358.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -21.2% | 27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9136.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-105.71 | $0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $53.1M | $75.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.0M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.0M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.9M | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.3M | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.2M | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $47.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.4M | $43.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-190.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.6M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-154.2K | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-276.0K | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0K | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 69.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 75.5% |
| Q4 25 | -433.6% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.0% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | -358.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.0% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.1% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-105.71 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.97 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.50 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.23 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.33 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.9M | $97.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $22.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-49.3M | $130.3M |
| Total Assets | $299.3M | $216.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $97.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.3M | $94.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.7M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2M | $93.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.8M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.8M | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.3M | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.8M | $107.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $247.1M | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.2M | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.9M | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $264.5M | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-49.3M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.0M | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $144.5M | $104.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.2M | $92.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.8M | $71.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.1M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $149.1M | $51.0M |
| Q4 25 | $299.3M | $216.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $534.6M | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $548.0M | $194.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $539.3M | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $549.2M | $213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $571.5M | $220.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $573.2M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $566.3M | $214.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.68× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.82× | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.78× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.77× | 2.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.2M | $14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.4M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.3% | 19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-13.3M | $41.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.2M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.8M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.4M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.0% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -506.51× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BBGI
| Audio Advertising | $40.5M | 76% |
| Digital Advertising | $12.6M | 24% |
PBYI
Segment breakdown not available.
