vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BUILD-A-BEAR WORKSHOP INC (BBW) and SILICOM LTD. (SILC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BUILD-A-BEAR WORKSHOP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($122.7M vs $61.9M, roughly 2.0× SILICOM LTD.). BUILD-A-BEAR WORKSHOP INC runs the higher net margin — 6.6% vs -18.5%, a 25.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SILICOM LTD. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 2.7%). BUILD-A-BEAR WORKSHOP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.7M vs $-3.3M).
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. is an American retailer headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri that sells teddy bears, stuffed animals, and characters. During store visits, customers go through an interactive process where the stuffed animal of their choice is assembled and tailored to their own preferences including varying scents, sounds, looks, and outfits. Build-A-Bear Workshop is the largest chain that operates in this style. The company's slogan was "Where Best Friends Are Made" from 1997–201...
Silicom Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that specializes in the design, manufacture and marketing of connectivity solutions for a range of servers and server-based systems. Its shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Silicom is a member of the RAD Group family of companies.
BBW vs SILC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $122.7M | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $-11.5M |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | -19.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.6% | -18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.7% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -17.7% | 16.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $-2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $122.7M | $61.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $128.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $58.1M |
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.7M |
| Q4 25 | 53.7% | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | -19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.8% |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -23.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | $-2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.94 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.17 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.61 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.7M | $42.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $150.6M | $117.5M |
| Total Assets | $326.5M | $152.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.7M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.1M |
| Q4 25 | $150.6M | $117.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $127.8M |
| Q4 25 | $326.5M | $152.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $318.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $308.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $150.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.2M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | $-3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.4% | -5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.3% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.01× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $793.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.4M |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BBW
| Direct To Consumer | $112.3M | 92% |
| Commercial Product And Service | $8.9M | 7% |
| International Franchising | $1.5M | 1% |
SILC
Segment breakdown not available.
