vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Best Buy (BBY) and Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Best Buy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.7B vs $270.2M, roughly 35.8× Fossil Group, Inc.). Best Buy runs the higher net margin — 1.4% vs -14.8%, a 16.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Best Buy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.4% vs -21.1%). Fossil Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-22.5M vs $-287.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Fossil Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-11.4% CAGR vs -18.7%).
Best Buy Co., Inc. is an American multinational consumer electronics retailer headquartered in Richfield, Minnesota. Originally founded by Richard M. Schulze and James Wheeler in 1966 as an audio specialty store called Sound of Music, it was rebranded under its current name with an emphasis on consumer electronics in 1983.
Fossil Group, Inc., is an American fashion design and manufacturer founded in 1984 by Tom Kartsotis and based in Richardson, Texas. Their brands include Fossil, Relic, Michele Watch, Skagen Denmark, WSI, and Zodiac Watches. Fossil also makes licensed accessories for brands such as BMW, Puma, Emporio Armani, Michael Kors, DKNY, Diesel, Kate Spade New York, Tory Burch, Chaps, and Armani Exchange.
BBY vs FOSL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.7B | $270.2M |
| Net Profit | $140.0M | $-40.0M |
| Gross Margin | 23.2% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.0% | -8.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | -14.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.4% | -21.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.7% | -257.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.66 | $-0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | $270.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4B | $220.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8B | $233.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $342.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3B | $287.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8B | $260.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6B | $254.9M |
| Q4 25 | $140.0M | $-40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.0M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $202.0M | $-17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $273.0M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $291.0M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.0M | $-38.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $460.0M | $-24.3M |
| Q4 25 | 23.2% | 49.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.2% | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | 53.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.3% | 52.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.5% | 52.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | -8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | -2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | -11.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | -7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | -11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | -9.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | $-0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.87 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.95 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.26 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.34 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.11 | $-0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $923.0M | $79.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | $169.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $112.6M |
| Total Assets | $16.8B | $701.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 1.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $923.0M | $79.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $109.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $78.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $643.0M | $123.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $106.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $104.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $112.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $169.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $165.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $167.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $162.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $173.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $156.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $202.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $150.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $140.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $148.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $189.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | $229.1M |
| Q4 25 | $16.8B | $701.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.3B | $704.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1B | $686.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0B | $763.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6B | $812.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $785.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.0B | $891.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.44× | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.43× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.38× | 1.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.38× | 0.89× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-99.0M | $-22.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-287.0M | $-22.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.0% | -8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.71× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $-46.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-99.0M | $-22.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $749.0M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.0M | $-60.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-256.0M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $661.0M | $-22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $156.0M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $622.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-287.0M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $574.0M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-132.0M | $-60.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-449.0M | $28.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $478.0M | $-24.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $36.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $997.0M | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | -26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.8% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | -0.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.27× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.57× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BBY
Segment breakdown not available.
FOSL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $109.7M | 41% |
| Traditional Watches | $91.3M | 34% |
| Other | $50.8M | 19% |
| Leathers | $9.5M | 4% |
| Jewelry | $4.0M | 1% |
| Smartwatches | $3.3M | 1% |
| Products Other | $1.6M | 1% |
