vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Best Buy (BBY) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Best Buy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.7B vs $6.0B, roughly 1.6× Genuine Parts Company). Best Buy runs the higher net margin — 1.4% vs -10.1%, a 11.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Genuine Parts Company posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.1% vs 2.4%). Genuine Parts Company produced more free cash flow last quarter ($260.7M vs $-287.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Genuine Parts Company's revenue compounded faster (1.9% CAGR vs -18.7%).
Best Buy Co., Inc. is an American multinational consumer electronics retailer headquartered in Richfield, Minnesota. Originally founded by Richard M. Schulze and James Wheeler in 1966 as an audio specialty store called Sound of Music, it was rebranded under its current name with an emphasis on consumer electronics in 1983.
Genuine Parts Company (GPC) is an American automotive and industrial parts distributor based in Atlanta, Georgia. Established by brothers Carlyle and Malcolm Fraser in 1928, the company has approximately 60,000 employees. In addition to the United States, GPC has operated in Australasia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, and the United Kingdom.
BBY vs GPC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.7B | $6.0B |
| Net Profit | $140.0M | $-609.5M |
| Gross Margin | 23.2% | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.0% | -13.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | -10.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.4% | 4.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.7% | -558.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.66 | $-4.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8B | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.9B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6B | $5.8B |
| Q4 25 | $140.0M | $-609.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.0M | $226.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $202.0M | $254.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.0M | $194.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $273.0M | $133.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $291.0M | $226.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.0M | $295.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $460.0M | $248.9M |
| Q4 25 | 23.2% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.2% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 37.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.3% | 36.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.5% | 35.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | -13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 5.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | $-4.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.87 | $1.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.95 | $1.83 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.55 | $1.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.26 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.34 | $1.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $2.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.11 | $1.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $923.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | $4.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $4.4B |
| Total Assets | $16.8B | $20.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $923.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $643.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | $16.8B | $20.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.3B | $20.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1B | $20.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8B | $19.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0B | $19.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6B | $20.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $18.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.0B | $18.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.44× | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.38× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-99.0M | $380.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-287.0M | $260.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.0% | 4.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | -0.71× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $420.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-99.0M | $380.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $749.0M | $341.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.0M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $-40.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-256.0M | $155.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $661.0M | $484.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $156.0M | $293.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $318.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-287.0M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $574.0M | $240.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-132.0M | $81.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $-160.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-449.0M | $-26.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $478.0M | $358.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $150.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $997.0M | $202.6M |
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | -2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.8% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.8% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.03× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | 0.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.14× | -0.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.94× | 1.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.27× | 2.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | 0.99× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.57× | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
