vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BCB BANCORP INC (BCBP) and System1, Inc. (SST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
System1, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.9M vs $26.2M, roughly 2.0× BCB BANCORP INC). System1, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -26.0% vs -49.7%, a 23.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BCB BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.1% vs -31.3%). Over the past eight quarters, BCB BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs -21.8%).
System1 is an American Internet advertising company. Formerly known as OpenMail, it was founded in 2013. It describes itself as operating a "Responsive Acquisition Marketing Platform", and cites privacy as one of its principal foci, although it has been criticized for its influence on privacy-focused properties, including search engine Startpage.com. It is headquartered in Marina del Rey, California.
BCBP vs SST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.2M | $51.9M |
| Net Profit | $-12.0M | $-13.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -71.9% | -33.6% |
| Net Margin | -49.7% | -26.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.1% | -31.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -467.6% | 4.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.73 | $-3.58 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.2M | $51.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $78.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.8M | $74.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $75.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.4M | $94.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | $84.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.0M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3M | $-18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.3M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $-23.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $-10.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.9% |
| Q4 25 | -71.9% | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | -25.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.9% | -20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -49.2% | -17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | -15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.7% | -24.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | -30.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.0% | -30.4% |
| Q4 25 | -49.7% | -26.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | -22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.0% | -21.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | -18.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | -26.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | -27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.2% | -12.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.73 | $-3.58 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $-2.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.51 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | $-3.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | $-3.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $-3.80 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.32 | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $86.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $305.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $304.3M | $30.5M |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $405.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 10.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $86.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $43.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $75.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $69.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $305.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $259.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $263.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $267.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $255.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $259.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $263.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $268.6M |
| Q4 25 | $304.3M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $318.5M | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.7M | $58.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $314.7M | $67.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $323.9M | $80.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $328.1M | $90.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.7M | $109.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $320.1M | $131.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $405.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $385.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $429.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $419.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $459.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $479.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $511.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | $521.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.98× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $35.9M | $-10.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $34.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 133.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $58.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $35.9M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3M | $24.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.7M | $772.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.5M | $-5.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.3M | $-16.0M |
| Q4 25 | $34.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | $-36.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 133.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | -21.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 287.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 166.0% | -0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.53× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.88× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.