vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BCB BANCORP INC (BCBP) and Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Neuronetics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.8M vs $26.2M, roughly 1.6× BCB BANCORP INC). Neuronetics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -17.2% vs -49.7%, a 32.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Neuronetics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (85.7% vs 13.1%). BCB BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($34.9M vs $692.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Neuronetics, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.9% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Neuronetics is a Malvern, PA based, publicly traded company incorporated in Delaware in April 2003, that develops non-invasive treatments for psychiatric disorders that have shown resistance or lack of improvement using traditional medicine. The treatments are based upon neuromodulation technology.
BCBP vs STIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.2M | $41.8M |
| Net Profit | $-12.0M | $-7.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | -71.9% | -12.1% |
| Net Margin | -49.7% | -17.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.1% | 85.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -467.6% | 43.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.73 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.2M | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $37.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $38.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.8M | $32.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $18.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.4M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | $17.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.0M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.3M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 52.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 46.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 66.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 75.1% |
| Q4 25 | -71.9% | -12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | -19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.9% | -21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -49.2% | -34.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | -51.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.7% | -41.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | -51.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.0% | -39.4% |
| Q4 25 | -49.7% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | -24.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | -26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.0% | -39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | -56.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | -72.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | -59.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.2% | -45.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.73 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.51 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.32 | $-0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $28.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $65.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $304.3M | $22.4M |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $141.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.94× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $28.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $65.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $55.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $55.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $55.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $59.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $59.4M |
| Q4 25 | $304.3M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $318.5M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.7M | $27.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $314.7M | $35.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $323.9M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $328.1M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.7M | $19.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $320.1M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $141.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $145.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $140.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | $103.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $35.9M | $908.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $34.9M | $692.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 133.3% | 1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $58.2M | $-21.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $35.9M | $908.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7M | $-785.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.7M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.5M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.3M | $-12.0M |
| Q4 25 | $34.9M | $692.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | $-899.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-17.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.5M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.4M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1M | $-12.4M |
| Q4 25 | 133.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.4% | -9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | -53.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 287.5% | -38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 166.0% | -31.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | -34.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.3% | -71.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.53× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.88× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
