vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BayCom Corp (BCML) and GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP (GOOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($43.5M vs $25.9M, roughly 1.7× BayCom Corp). BayCom Corp runs the higher net margin — 26.5% vs 12.4%, a 14.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.3% vs 9.4%). Over the past eight quarters, GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs 2.9%).
BayCom Corp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company operating through its wholly owned subsidiary Bay Commercial Bank. It primarily serves small and medium-sized enterprises and retail customers across Northern California, offering commercial lending, deposit products, personal banking services, and localized wealth management solutions.
Gladstone Commercial Corp is a publicly traded US real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning, and operating diversified industrial and commercial properties. It offers long-term net lease agreements to tenants across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare and professional services sectors, mainly serving small to mid-sized business clients.
BCML vs GOOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $43.5M |
| Net Profit | $6.9M | $5.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 26.5% | 12.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 16.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.1% | -25.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | $43.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.7M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $39.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $37.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6M | $39.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $37.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $35.7M |
| Q4 25 | $6.9M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.5% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.9% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | 9.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.58 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.51 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.55 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.50 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $10.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $843.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.6M | $171.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.91× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $843.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $843.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $794.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $740.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $693.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $692.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $722.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $719.4M |
| Q4 25 | $338.6M | $171.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.3M | $184.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.6M | $177.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $183.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.4M | $171.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.7M | $168.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.3M | $145.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $314.2M | $147.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.88× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.8M | $88.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 116.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.64× | 16.38× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.8M | $88.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | $57.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 116.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.64× | 16.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | 4.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 7.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | 3.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.96× | 7.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | 8.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.86× | 4.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
