vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BayCom Corp (BCML) and Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BayCom Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.9M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.8× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs 26.5%, a 37.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs 9.4%). BayCom Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.1M vs $8.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs 2.9%).
BayCom Corp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company operating through its wholly owned subsidiary Bay Commercial Bank. It primarily serves small and medium-sized enterprises and retail customers across Northern California, offering commercial lending, deposit products, personal banking services, and localized wealth management solutions.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
BCML vs IDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $14.6M |
| Net Profit | $6.9M | $9.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 68.5% |
| Operating Margin | 36.6% | 62.4% |
| Net Margin | 26.5% | 64.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 92.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.1% | 220.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.7M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | $6.9M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 36.6% | 62.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.3% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.3% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.3% | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | 26.5% | 64.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.9% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | 36.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.58 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.51 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.55 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.50 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.6M | $108.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $116.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $338.6M | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.3M | $74.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.6M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $39.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.4M | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.7M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.3M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $314.2M | $21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $116.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $28.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.8M | $10.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.1M | $8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 116.2% | 56.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | 17.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.64× | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.1M | $12.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.8M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | $709.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | 116.2% | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.6% | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.6% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.2% | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.7% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.64× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.96× | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.86× | 1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
