vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BayCom Corp (BCML) and Legacy Housing Corp (LEGH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BayCom Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.9M vs $25.5M, roughly 1.0× Legacy Housing Corp). Legacy Housing Corp runs the higher net margin — 32.2% vs 26.5%, a 5.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BayCom Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs -30.6%). BayCom Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.1M vs $15.7M). Over the past eight quarters, BayCom Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.9% CAGR vs -9.1%).
BayCom Corp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company operating through its wholly owned subsidiary Bay Commercial Bank. It primarily serves small and medium-sized enterprises and retail customers across Northern California, offering commercial lending, deposit products, personal banking services, and localized wealth management solutions.
Legacy Housing Corp is a prominent U.S.-based manufacturer of affordable manufactured homes, tiny homes, and accessory dwelling units. It mainly caters to low- and middle-income consumers across North America, providing customizable residential solutions, supporting construction materials, and after-sales services for individual and community development clients.
BCML vs LEGH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $25.5M |
| Net Profit | $6.9M | $8.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.4% |
| Operating Margin | 36.6% | 40.4% |
| Net Margin | 26.5% | 32.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | -30.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.1% | -43.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | $25.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.7M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $24.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | $36.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $31.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $30.8M |
| Q4 25 | $6.9M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $10.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $16.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $15.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.6% |
| Q4 25 | 36.6% | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.3% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.3% | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.6% | 47.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | 42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.3% | 54.3% |
| Q4 25 | 26.5% | 32.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | 38.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 42.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.9% | 39.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 52.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | 51.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | 49.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.58 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.51 | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.55 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $0.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.50 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $8.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.6M | $528.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $580.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $621.0K |
| Q4 25 | $338.6M | $528.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.3M | $521.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.6M | $512.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $503.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.4M | $494.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.7M | $479.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.3M | $463.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $314.2M | $450.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $580.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $557.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $552.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $544.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $534.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $521.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $514.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $510.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.8M | $19.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.1M | $15.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 116.2% | 61.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | 13.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.64× | 2.32× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.1M | $28.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.8M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | 116.2% | 61.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.6% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.1% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.6% | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | 32.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.7% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.64× | 2.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.96× | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 0.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.86× | 0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BCML
Segment breakdown not available.
LEGH
| Commercial Sales | $8.6M | 34% |
| Retail Store Sales | $6.0M | 24% |
| Inventory Finance Sales | $5.0M | 20% |
| Direct Sales | $4.4M | 17% |
| Other | $1.5M | 6% |
