vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BayCom Corp (BCML) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BayCom Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.9M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.9× Laird Superfood, Inc.). BayCom Corp runs the higher net margin — 26.5% vs -13.2%, a 39.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 9.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 2.9%).
BayCom Corp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company operating through its wholly owned subsidiary Bay Commercial Bank. It primarily serves small and medium-sized enterprises and retail customers across Northern California, offering commercial lending, deposit products, personal banking services, and localized wealth management solutions.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
BCML vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $6.9M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 36.6% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 26.5% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.1% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.7M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $6.9M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 36.6% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.3% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.3% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.3% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 26.5% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.51 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.6M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $338.6M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.6M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.7M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.3M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $314.2M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.8M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 116.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.64× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.8M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 116.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.86× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BCML
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |