vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BayCom Corp (BCML) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $25.9M, roughly 1.6× BayCom Corp). BayCom Corp runs the higher net margin — 26.5% vs -19.9%, a 46.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BayCom Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs -20.7%). BayCom Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.1M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, BayCom Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.9% CAGR vs -3.4%).
BayCom Corp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company operating through its wholly owned subsidiary Bay Commercial Bank. It primarily serves small and medium-sized enterprises and retail customers across Northern California, offering commercial lending, deposit products, personal banking services, and localized wealth management solutions.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
BCML vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $6.9M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | 36.6% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | 26.5% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.1% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.7M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $6.9M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | 36.6% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.3% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.3% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.6% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.3% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 26.5% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.9% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.58 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.51 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.55 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.50 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.6M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $338.6M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.3M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.6M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.4M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.7M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.3M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $314.2M | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $426.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.8M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.1M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 116.2% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.64× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.1M | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.8M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 116.2% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.6% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.6% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.2% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.7% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.86× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BCML
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
