vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FLANIGANS ENTERPRISES INC (BDL) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Yum China Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $52.6M, roughly 53.7× FLANIGANS ENTERPRISES INC). Yum China Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 1.5%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Yum China Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.8% vs 4.6%). FLANIGANS ENTERPRISES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.5M vs $-116.0M). Over the past eight quarters, FLANIGANS ENTERPRISES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -2.3%).
Flanigans Enterprises Inc. is a U.S.-based hospitality company focused on the Florida market. It operates a chain of casual dining restaurants under the Flanigan's Seafood Bar and Grill brand, plus retail package liquor stores. Its key customer segments include local residents and regional tourists, offering affordably priced seafood, American comfort food and assorted beverages.
Yum China Holdings, Inc. is an American-Chinese Fortune 500 fast-food restaurant company based in Shanghai, China. With US$9.5 billion in revenue and 10,600 restaurants worldwide it is one of the largest restaurant companies. It was spun off from Yum! Brands in 2016, becoming an independent, publicly traded company on November 1, 2016. Yum China is a trademark licensee of Yum Brands, paying 3% of total systemwide sales to Yum Brands. It operates 8,484 restaurants in over 1,100 cities located ...
BDL vs YUMC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $52.6M | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $805.0K | $140.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 6.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.6% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1363.6% | 21.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $52.6M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.0M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.4M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.4M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.1M | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | $805.0K | $140.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $896.0K | $282.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $215.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $292.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.0K | $115.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.0K | $297.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $212.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $287.0M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.6% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $0.76 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.45 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.60 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.04 | $0.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $66.0M | $5.4B |
| Total Assets | $142.1M | $10.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $732.0K | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.0K | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $66.0M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.2M | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.3M | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.0M | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.6M | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.2M | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.3M | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.1M | $5.9B |
| Q4 25 | $142.1M | $10.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.6M | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.7M | $11.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.3M | $11.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.9M | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.1M | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.1M | $11.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.4M | $11.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.9M | $125.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.5M | $-116.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.5% | -4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 8.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.14× | 0.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.2M | $840.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $477.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $412.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | $452.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7M | $167.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $401.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $442.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.5M | $-116.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $351.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $290.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.0M | $315.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $244.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $232.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $253.0M |
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.5% | 10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | 6.14× | 0.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | 1.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.02× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.73× | 1.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | 140.02× | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.75× | 1.89× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BDL
| Restaurant Food Sales | $30.9M | 59% |
| Package Store Sales | $13.3M | 25% |
| Restaurant Bar Sales | $7.9M | 15% |
YUMC
| Revenue From External Customers | $2.1B | 75% |
| Pizza Hut | $540.0M | 19% |
| Corporate And Unallocated | $105.0M | 4% |
| Other Revenue | $45.0M | 2% |
| Franchise Fees And Income | $25.0M | 1% |
