vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Baird Medical Investment Holdings Ltd (BDMD) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.5M vs $8.0M, roughly 1.4× Baird Medical Investment Holdings Ltd). TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($589.0K vs $-3.2M).
Baird Medical Investment Holdings Ltd is a healthcare-focused investment holding company mainly operating in the Chinese market. It invests in and manages businesses covering in vitro diagnostic devices, medical consumables, and community healthcare services, serving clinical institutions and individual consumers.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
BDMD vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.0M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $-11.4M | — |
| Gross Margin | 82.1% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | -131.3% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | -142.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.4M | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -131.3% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -142.7% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $35.6M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $77.0M | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.6M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.0M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.2M | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.2M | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -40.7% | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -40.7% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
