vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST (BDN) and STONERIDGE INC (SRI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STONERIDGE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($205.2M vs $127.0M, roughly 1.6× BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST). On growth, BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.5% vs -6.0%). Over the past eight quarters, BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST's revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Brandywine Realty Trust is a Philadelphia-based real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests in office buildings in Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and Austin, Texas.
Stoneridge Inc is a global designer and manufacturer of advanced electrical and electronic components, integrated systems, and sensor solutions. It serves automotive, commercial vehicle, off-highway, and aerospace sectors, delivering products that boost vehicle safety, efficiency, connectivity, and environmental performance across key global markets.
BDN vs SRI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.0M | $205.2M |
| Net Profit | $-48.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 16.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.2% | -14.4% |
| Net Margin | -38.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 4.5% | -6.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -80.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $-2.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $127.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $121.0M | $205.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.4M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.6M | $228.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.5M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.9M | $218.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.8M | $213.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $125.3M | $237.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-48.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-36.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.9M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-88.7M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.0M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-44.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-165.2M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $2.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.3% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.6% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.4% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.2% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 64.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.1% | 22.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | -14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.3% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.5% | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | -38.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.3% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.5% | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.2% | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -125.4% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | $-2.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.51 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.96 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.2M | $66.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $180.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $179.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.6B | $551.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $36.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.3M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.5M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.6M | $49.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.4M | $79.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.2M | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.5M | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $42.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $201.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $792.7M | $179.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $841.5M | $251.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $879.8M | $260.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $993.6M | $253.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $271.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $270.5M |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $632.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $639.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $657.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $621.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $662.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $666.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.23× | 1.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.23× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.13× | 0.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $8.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $12.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.7M | $8.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.5M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.4M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $181.1M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.2M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.2M | $8.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 3.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BDN
| Rents | $120.7M | 95% |
| Third party management fees, labor reimbursement and leasing | $4.7M | 4% |
SRI
| Control Devices | $51.7M | 25% |
| Electronics | $38.0M | 19% |
| EE | $34.2M | 17% |
| SE | $28.6M | 14% |
| NL | $24.5M | 12% |
| Stoneridge Brazil | $14.1M | 7% |
| Asia Pacific | $13.1M | 6% |
