vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST (BDN) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($221.4M vs $127.0M, roughly 1.7× BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST). UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC runs the higher net margin — 0.2% vs -38.4%, a 38.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs 4.5%). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs 0.7%).
Brandywine Realty Trust is a Philadelphia-based real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests in office buildings in Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and Austin, Texas.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
BDN vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.0M | $221.4M |
| Net Profit | $-48.8M | $433.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.2% | 0.2% |
| Net Margin | -38.4% | 0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.5% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -80.4% | -60.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $127.0M | $221.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $121.0M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.4M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.6M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.5M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.9M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.8M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $125.3M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-48.8M | $433.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $-36.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.9M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-88.7M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-44.5M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-165.2M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 64.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | -38.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -125.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.28 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.51 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.96 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.2M | $162.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $127.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $339.9M |
| Total Assets | $3.6B | $852.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $36.2M | $162.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.3M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.5M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.6M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.4M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.2M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.5M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $115.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $127.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $137.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $339.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $792.7M | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $841.5M | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $879.8M | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $993.6M | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $239.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | $852.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $706.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.23× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.70× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.63× | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.23× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.13× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $7.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 16.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.7M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.5M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.4M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $181.1M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.2M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.2M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BDN
| Rents | $120.7M | 95% |
| Third party management fees, labor reimbursement and leasing | $4.7M | 4% |
UTI
Segment breakdown not available.
