vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloom Energy Corp (BE) and CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bloom Energy Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($751.1M vs $633.7M, roughly 1.2× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). Bloom Energy Corp runs the higher net margin — 9.4% vs 0.3%, a 9.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -3.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Bloom Energy Corp's revenue compounded faster (51.7% CAGR vs 13.8%).
KR Sridhar is an Indian American engineer, inventor, professor, and entrepreneur. He is the founder, chairman, and chief executive officer (CEO) of Bloom Energy. Prior, Sridhar was a professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Space Technologies Laboratory (STL) at the University of Arizona. He worked with and advised NASA, and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
BE vs CENX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.1M | $633.7M |
| Net Profit | $70.7M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | 13.0% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 5.2% |
| Net Margin | 9.4% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.4% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 396.7% | -96.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $751.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $772.8M | $633.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $513.3M | $632.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.3M | $628.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.3M | $633.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.0M | $630.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.8M | $539.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $326.5M | $560.8M |
| Q1 26 | $70.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.2M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.4M | $29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.2M | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.6M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.2M | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.0% | 3.6% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.7% | -0.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.91 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-100.00 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.45 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $134.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $948.0K | $805.6M |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $134.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.1M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $574.8M | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.8M | $44.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $802.9M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $581.7M | $41.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $948.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $768.6M | $805.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.1M | $741.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $594.6M | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $578.3M | $726.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $562.5M | $694.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $430.9M | $628.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.3M | $601.5M |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.66× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $102.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $67.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 10.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 57.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $84.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $418.1M | $102.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-213.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-110.7M | $72.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $484.2M | $-41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-69.5M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-175.5M | $11.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $395.1M | $67.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $-18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-220.4M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-124.9M | $51.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $473.1M | $-54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-83.8M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.5M | $-5.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.6% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.4% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.0% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.4% | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 3.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 293.18× | 57.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.60× | -0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BE
| Product | $653.3M | 87% |
| Service | $61.9M | 8% |
| Installation | $25.9M | 3% |
| Electricity | $9.9M | 1% |
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
