vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloom Energy Corp (BE) and CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $751.1M, roughly 2.0× Bloom Energy Corp). Bloom Energy Corp runs the higher net margin — 9.4% vs 5.8%, a 3.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bloom Energy Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (130.4% vs 4.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Bloom Energy Corp's revenue compounded faster (51.7% CAGR vs 4.4%).
KR Sridhar is an Indian American engineer, inventor, professor, and entrepreneur. He is the founder, chairman, and chief executive officer (CEO) of Bloom Energy. Prior, Sridhar was a professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Space Technologies Laboratory (STL) at the University of Arizona. He worked with and advised NASA, and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
BE vs CLH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.1M | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $70.7M | $86.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 10.6% |
| Net Margin | 9.4% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 130.4% | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 3.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $751.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $772.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $513.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $326.5M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $70.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.0M | $118.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.2M | $126.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.4M | $58.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.2M | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.6M | $115.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.2M | $133.3M |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.0% | 33.3% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | 13.9% |
| Q1 26 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.7% | 8.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.91 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-100.00 | $2.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | $2.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $1.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.45 | $1.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $2.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $2.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $127.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $948.0K | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $7.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $127.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.1M | $91.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $574.8M | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.8M | $105.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $802.9M | $102.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.7M | $82.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $581.7M | $91.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $948.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $768.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.1M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $594.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $578.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $562.5M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $430.9M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.3M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $7.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.66× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $355.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $233.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 15.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $441.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $418.1M | $355.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $302.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-213.1M | $208.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-110.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $484.2M | $303.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-69.5M | $239.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-175.5M | $216.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $395.1M | $233.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $207.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-220.4M | $118.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-124.9M | $-117.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $473.1M | $241.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-83.8M | $142.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.5M | $80.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.1% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.4% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.4% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 8.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 293.18× | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.60× | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BE
| Product | $653.3M | 87% |
| Service | $61.9M | 8% |
| Installation | $25.9M | 3% |
| Electricity | $9.9M | 1% |
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
