vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloom Energy Corp (BE) and Dexcom (DXCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dexcom is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $751.1M, roughly 1.7× Bloom Energy Corp). Dexcom runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs 9.4%, a 11.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bloom Energy Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (130.4% vs 21.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Bloom Energy Corp's revenue compounded faster (51.7% CAGR vs 12.0%).
KR Sridhar is an Indian American engineer, inventor, professor, and entrepreneur. He is the founder, chairman, and chief executive officer (CEO) of Bloom Energy. Prior, Sridhar was a professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Space Technologies Laboratory (STL) at the University of Arizona. He worked with and advised NASA, and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.
Dexcom, Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company that develops, manufactures, produces and distributes a line of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for diabetes management. It operates internationally with global headquarters and R&D center in San Diego, California, U.S.A. and manufacturing facilities in Mesa, Arizona, U.S.A.; Batu Kawan, Malaysia and Athenry, County Galway, Ireland.
BE vs DXCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.1M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $70.7M | $267.3M |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 25.6% |
| Net Margin | 9.4% | 21.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 130.4% | 21.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 153.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.67 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $751.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $772.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $513.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.8M | $994.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $326.5M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $70.7M | $267.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $267.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.0M | $283.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.2M | $179.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.4M | $105.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.2M | $151.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.6M | $134.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.2M | $143.5M |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | 62.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | 62.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 59.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | 56.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 58.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 59.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.0% | 62.4% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | 15.7% |
| Q1 26 | 9.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.5% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.7% | 14.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | $0.67 | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.91 | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-100.00 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.45 | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $917.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $948.0K | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $6.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $917.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $917.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $574.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.8M | $904.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $802.9M | $606.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.7M | $621.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $581.7M | $939.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $948.0K | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $768.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.1M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $594.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $578.3M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $562.5M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $430.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.3M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $6.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.66× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BE
| Product | $653.3M | 87% |
| Service | $61.9M | 8% |
| Installation | $25.9M | 3% |
| Electricity | $9.9M | 1% |
DXCM
Segment breakdown not available.
