vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloom Energy Corp (BE) and BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $751.1M, roughly 2.0× Bloom Energy Corp). Bloom Energy Corp runs the higher net margin — 9.4% vs 8.7%, a 0.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bloom Energy Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (130.4% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Bloom Energy Corp's revenue compounded faster (51.7% CAGR vs 10.3%).

KR Sridhar is an Indian American engineer, inventor, professor, and entrepreneur. He is the founder, chairman, and chief executive officer (CEO) of Bloom Energy. Prior, Sridhar was a professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Space Technologies Laboratory (STL) at the University of Arizona. He worked with and advised NASA, and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.

Brinker International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality industry company that owns Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant chains. Founded in 1975 and based in Dallas, Texas, Brinker currently owns, operates, or franchises 1,672 restaurants under the names Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy worldwide.

BE vs EAT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
EAT
EAT
2.0× larger
EAT
$1.5B
$751.1M
BE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BE
BE
+127.2% gap
BE
130.4%
3.2%
EAT
Higher net margin
BE
BE
0.7% more per $
BE
9.4%
8.7%
EAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BE
BE
Annualised
BE
51.7%
10.3%
EAT

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Revenue
$751.1M
$1.5B
Net Profit
$70.7M
$127.9M
Gross Margin
30.0%
Operating Margin
17.3%
11.3%
Net Margin
9.4%
8.7%
Revenue YoY
130.4%
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
EPS (diluted)
$0.44
$2.87

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$751.1M
$1.5B
Q4 25
$772.8M
$1.5B
Q3 25
$513.3M
$1.3B
Q2 25
$396.3M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$319.3M
$1.4B
Q4 24
$567.0M
$1.4B
Q3 24
$321.8M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$326.5M
$1.2B
Net Profit
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$70.7M
$127.9M
Q4 25
$1.4M
$128.5M
Q3 25
$-23.0M
$99.5M
Q2 25
$-42.2M
$107.0M
Q1 25
$-23.4M
$119.1M
Q4 24
$105.2M
$118.5M
Q3 24
$-14.6M
$38.5M
Q2 24
$-61.2M
$57.3M
Gross Margin
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
30.0%
Q4 25
31.0%
Q3 25
29.5%
Q2 25
27.0%
Q1 25
27.8%
Q4 24
38.7%
Q3 24
24.5%
Q2 24
21.0%
Operating Margin
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
17.3%
11.3%
Q4 25
11.3%
11.6%
Q3 25
1.5%
8.7%
Q2 25
-0.9%
9.8%
Q1 25
-6.0%
11.0%
Q4 24
18.5%
11.5%
Q3 24
-3.0%
5.0%
Q2 24
-7.1%
6.1%
Net Margin
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
9.4%
8.7%
Q4 25
0.2%
8.8%
Q3 25
-4.5%
7.4%
Q2 25
-10.6%
7.3%
Q1 25
-7.3%
8.4%
Q4 24
18.5%
8.7%
Q3 24
-4.5%
3.4%
Q2 24
-18.7%
4.7%
EPS (diluted)
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$0.44
$2.87
Q4 25
$99.91
$2.86
Q3 25
$-100.00
$2.17
Q2 25
$-0.18
$2.31
Q1 25
$-0.10
$2.56
Q4 24
$0.45
$2.61
Q3 24
$-0.06
$0.84
Q2 24
$-0.27
$1.22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
$424.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$948.0K
$406.0M
Total Assets
$4.7B
$2.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.05×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.5B
$15.0M
Q3 25
$595.1M
$33.6M
Q2 25
$574.8M
$18.9M
Q1 25
$794.8M
$17.5M
Q4 24
$802.9M
$14.8M
Q3 24
$495.7M
$16.2M
Q2 24
$581.7M
$64.6M
Total Debt
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$424.4M
Q4 25
$2.6B
$451.3M
Q3 25
$1.1B
$525.8M
Q2 25
$1.1B
$426.0M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$518.3M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$652.0M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$806.9M
Q2 24
$1.1B
$786.3M
Stockholders' Equity
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$948.0K
$406.0M
Q4 25
$768.6M
$379.3M
Q3 25
$653.1M
$343.9M
Q2 25
$594.6M
$370.9M
Q1 25
$578.3M
$259.0M
Q4 24
$562.5M
$131.5M
Q3 24
$430.9M
$12.7M
Q2 24
$423.3M
$39.4M
Total Assets
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$4.7B
$2.8B
Q4 25
$4.4B
$2.7B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$2.5B
$2.7B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$2.6B
Q4 24
$2.7B
$2.6B
Q3 24
$2.6B
$2.5B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$2.6B
Debt / Equity
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
1.05×
Q4 25
3.41×
1.19×
Q3 25
1.73×
1.53×
Q2 25
1.91×
1.15×
Q1 25
1.96×
2.00×
Q4 24
2.01×
4.96×
Q3 24
2.62×
63.54×
Q2 24
2.66×
19.96×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$571.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.47×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$571.8M
Q4 25
$418.1M
$218.9M
Q3 25
$19.7M
$120.8M
Q2 25
$-213.1M
$186.0M
Q1 25
$-110.7M
$212.0M
Q4 24
$484.2M
$218.2M
Q3 24
$-69.5M
$62.8M
Q2 24
$-175.5M
$141.5M
Free Cash Flow
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$395.1M
$155.2M
Q3 25
$7.4M
$62.2M
Q2 25
$-220.4M
$106.1M
Q1 25
$-124.9M
$132.4M
Q4 24
$473.1M
$168.9M
Q3 24
$-83.8M
$6.3M
Q2 24
$-187.5M
$83.5M
FCF Margin
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
51.1%
10.7%
Q3 25
1.4%
4.6%
Q2 25
-55.6%
7.3%
Q1 25
-39.1%
9.3%
Q4 24
83.4%
12.4%
Q3 24
-26.0%
0.6%
Q2 24
-57.4%
6.9%
Capex Intensity
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.0%
4.4%
Q3 25
2.4%
4.3%
Q2 25
1.8%
5.5%
Q1 25
4.5%
5.6%
Q4 24
2.0%
3.6%
Q3 24
4.4%
5.0%
Q2 24
3.7%
4.8%
Cash Conversion
BE
BE
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
4.47×
Q4 25
293.18×
1.70×
Q3 25
1.21×
Q2 25
1.74×
Q1 25
1.78×
Q4 24
4.60×
1.84×
Q3 24
1.63×
Q2 24
2.47×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BE
BE

Product$653.3M87%
Service$61.9M8%
Installation$25.9M3%
Electricity$9.9M1%

EAT
EAT

Company sales$1.5B99%
Franchise revenues$14.7M1%

Related Comparisons