vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloom Energy Corp (BE) and Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bloom Energy Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($751.1M vs $544.0M, roughly 1.4× Fidelity National Financial, Inc.). Bloom Energy Corp runs the higher net margin — 9.4% vs -21.5%, a 30.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fidelity National Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.3% vs -3.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Bloom Energy Corp's revenue compounded faster (51.7% CAGR vs 13.7%).
KR Sridhar is an Indian American engineer, inventor, professor, and entrepreneur. He is the founder, chairman, and chief executive officer (CEO) of Bloom Energy. Prior, Sridhar was a professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Space Technologies Laboratory (STL) at the University of Arizona. He worked with and advised NASA, and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.
Fidelity National Financial, Inc., is an American provider of title insurance and settlement services to the real estate and mortgage industries. A Fortune 500 company, Fidelity National Financial generated approximately $8.469 billion in annual revenue in 2019 from its title and real estate-related operations. The company was the first instance of an attorney licensed by a Native American Tribe being certified as "authorized house counsel" in the state of Florida.
BE vs FNF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.1M | $544.0M |
| Net Profit | $70.7M | $-117.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 82.9% |
| Net Margin | 9.4% | -21.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.4% | 10.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 396.7% | -126.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $-0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $751.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $772.8M | $544.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $513.3M | $553.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.3M | $547.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.3M | $455.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.0M | $493.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.8M | $506.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $326.5M | $504.0M |
| Q1 26 | $70.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $-117.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.0M | $358.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.2M | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.4M | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.2M | $450.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.6M | $266.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.2M | $306.0M |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 82.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 81.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 69.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | 61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | 90.9% |
| Q1 26 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.5% | 64.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 91.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.7% | 60.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.91 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-100.00 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.45 | $1.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.97 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $1.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $948.0K | $7.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $109.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.1M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $574.8M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.8M | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $802.9M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.7M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $581.7M | $4.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | $948.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $768.6M | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.1M | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $594.6M | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $578.3M | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $562.5M | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $430.9M | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.3M | $7.3B |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $109.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $106.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $102.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $98.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $95.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $94.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $88.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.41× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | 0.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | 0.56× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.96× | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.62× | 0.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.66× | 0.58× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $418.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-213.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-110.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $484.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-69.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-175.5M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $395.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-220.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-124.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $473.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-83.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 293.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.60× | 3.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BE
| Product | $653.3M | 87% |
| Service | $61.9M | 8% |
| Installation | $25.9M | 3% |
| Electricity | $9.9M | 1% |
FNF
| Escrow Fees | $241.0M | 44% |
| Other Title Related Fees And Income | $182.0M | 33% |
| Service Link Excluding Title Premiums Escrow Fees And Subservicing Fees | $87.0M | 16% |
| Insurance Contracts Home Warranty | $31.0M | 6% |
