vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloom Energy Corp (BE) and OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bloom Energy Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($751.1M vs $692.4M, roughly 1.1× OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC). Bloom Energy Corp runs the higher net margin — 9.4% vs 5.2%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs -3.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Bloom Energy Corp's revenue compounded faster (51.7% CAGR vs 1.8%).
KR Sridhar is an Indian American engineer, inventor, professor, and entrepreneur. He is the founder, chairman, and chief executive officer (CEO) of Bloom Energy. Prior, Sridhar was a professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Space Technologies Laboratory (STL) at the University of Arizona. He worked with and advised NASA, and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.
Oceaneering International, Inc. is a subsea engineering and applied technology company based in Houston, Texas, U.S. that provides engineered services and hardware to customers who operate in marine, space, and other environments.
BE vs OII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.1M | $692.4M |
| Net Profit | $70.7M | $36.1M |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.4% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.4% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 396.7% | -79.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $751.1M | $692.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $772.8M | $668.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $513.3M | $742.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.3M | $698.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.3M | $674.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.0M | $713.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.8M | $679.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $326.5M | $668.8M |
| Q1 26 | $70.7M | $36.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $177.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.0M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.2M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.4M | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.2M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.6M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.2M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.0% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | 9.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.7% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.91 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-100.00 | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.45 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $488.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $948.0K | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $695.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.1M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $574.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $802.9M | $504.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $581.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $488.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $487.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $482.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $948.0K | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $768.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.1M | $907.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $594.6M | $842.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $578.3M | $773.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $562.5M | $714.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $430.9M | $698.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.3M | $651.0M |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.41× | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.66× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-76.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -11.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $418.1M | $221.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-213.1M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-110.7M | $-80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $484.2M | $128.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-69.5M | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-175.5M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-76.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $395.1M | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-220.4M | $46.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-124.9M | $-106.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $473.1M | $94.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-83.8M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.5M | $29.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.1% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.1% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.4% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.4% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 293.18× | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.60× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BE
| Product | $653.3M | 87% |
| Service | $61.9M | 8% |
| Installation | $25.9M | 3% |
| Electricity | $9.9M | 1% |
OII
| Backlog at end of period | $492.0M | 71% |
| Other | $162.8M | 24% |
| ROV days available | $22.5M | 3% |
| ROV days utilized | $15.1M | 2% |