vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloom Energy Corp (BE) and PATRICK INDUSTRIES INC (PATK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PATRICK INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($924.2M vs $751.1M, roughly 1.2× Bloom Energy Corp). Bloom Energy Corp runs the higher net margin — 9.4% vs 3.1%, a 6.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bloom Energy Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (130.4% vs 9.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Bloom Energy Corp's revenue compounded faster (51.7% CAGR vs -0.5%).

KR Sridhar is an Indian American engineer, inventor, professor, and entrepreneur. He is the founder, chairman, and chief executive officer (CEO) of Bloom Energy. Prior, Sridhar was a professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Space Technologies Laboratory (STL) at the University of Arizona. He worked with and advised NASA, and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.

Anduril Industries, Inc. is an American defense technology company specializing in the development of advanced autonomous systems.

BE vs PATK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PATK
PATK
1.2× larger
PATK
$924.2M
$751.1M
BE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BE
BE
+121.1% gap
BE
130.4%
9.2%
PATK
Higher net margin
BE
BE
6.3% more per $
BE
9.4%
3.1%
PATK
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BE
BE
Annualised
BE
51.7%
-0.5%
PATK

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Revenue
$751.1M
$924.2M
Net Profit
$70.7M
$29.1M
Gross Margin
30.0%
23.0%
Operating Margin
17.3%
6.2%
Net Margin
9.4%
3.1%
Revenue YoY
130.4%
9.2%
Net Profit YoY
99.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.44
$0.82

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
$751.1M
Q4 25
$772.8M
$924.2M
Q3 25
$513.3M
$975.6M
Q2 25
$396.3M
$1.0B
Q1 25
$319.3M
$1.0B
Q4 24
$567.0M
$846.1M
Q3 24
$321.8M
$919.4M
Q2 24
$326.5M
$1.0B
Net Profit
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
$70.7M
Q4 25
$1.4M
$29.1M
Q3 25
$-23.0M
$35.3M
Q2 25
$-42.2M
$32.4M
Q1 25
$-23.4M
$38.2M
Q4 24
$105.2M
$14.6M
Q3 24
$-14.6M
$40.9M
Q2 24
$-61.2M
$47.9M
Gross Margin
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
30.0%
Q4 25
31.0%
23.0%
Q3 25
29.5%
22.6%
Q2 25
27.0%
23.9%
Q1 25
27.8%
22.8%
Q4 24
38.7%
22.1%
Q3 24
24.5%
23.1%
Q2 24
21.0%
22.8%
Operating Margin
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
17.3%
Q4 25
11.3%
6.2%
Q3 25
1.5%
6.8%
Q2 25
-0.9%
8.3%
Q1 25
-6.0%
6.5%
Q4 24
18.5%
4.7%
Q3 24
-3.0%
8.1%
Q2 24
-7.1%
8.3%
Net Margin
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
9.4%
Q4 25
0.2%
3.1%
Q3 25
-4.5%
3.6%
Q2 25
-10.6%
3.1%
Q1 25
-7.3%
3.8%
Q4 24
18.5%
1.7%
Q3 24
-4.5%
4.4%
Q2 24
-18.7%
4.7%
EPS (diluted)
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
$0.44
Q4 25
$99.91
$0.82
Q3 25
$-100.00
$1.01
Q2 25
$-0.18
$0.96
Q1 25
$-0.10
$1.11
Q4 24
$0.45
$-1.44
Q3 24
$-0.06
$1.80
Q2 24
$-0.27
$2.16

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$26.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$948.0K
$1.2B
Total Assets
$4.7B
$3.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.10×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.5B
$26.4M
Q3 25
$595.1M
$20.7M
Q2 25
$574.8M
$22.0M
Q1 25
$794.8M
$86.6M
Q4 24
$802.9M
$33.6M
Q3 24
$495.7M
$52.6M
Q2 24
$581.7M
$44.0M
Total Debt
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.6B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$1.1B
Q2 25
$1.1B
Q1 25
$1.1B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.1B
Stockholders' Equity
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
$948.0K
Q4 25
$768.6M
$1.2B
Q3 25
$653.1M
$1.2B
Q2 25
$594.6M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$578.3M
$1.1B
Q4 24
$562.5M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$430.9M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$423.3M
$1.1B
Total Assets
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
$4.7B
Q4 25
$4.4B
$3.1B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$3.1B
Q2 25
$2.5B
$3.1B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$3.2B
Q4 24
$2.7B
$3.0B
Q3 24
$2.6B
$3.1B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$3.0B
Debt / Equity
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.41×
1.10×
Q3 25
1.73×
Q2 25
1.91×
Q1 25
1.96×
Q4 24
2.01×
1.18×
Q3 24
2.62×
Q2 24
2.66×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$130.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$112.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
12.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.50×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$246.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
$418.1M
$130.8M
Q3 25
$19.7M
$9.1M
Q2 25
$-213.1M
$149.4M
Q1 25
$-110.7M
$40.1M
Q4 24
$484.2M
$102.7M
Q3 24
$-69.5M
$51.5M
Q2 24
$-175.5M
$137.5M
Free Cash Flow
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
$395.1M
$112.7M
Q3 25
$7.4M
$-17.2M
Q2 25
$-220.4M
$131.1M
Q1 25
$-124.9M
$19.9M
Q4 24
$473.1M
$77.2M
Q3 24
$-83.8M
$33.7M
Q2 24
$-187.5M
$120.6M
FCF Margin
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
51.1%
12.2%
Q3 25
1.4%
-1.8%
Q2 25
-55.6%
12.5%
Q1 25
-39.1%
2.0%
Q4 24
83.4%
9.1%
Q3 24
-26.0%
3.7%
Q2 24
-57.4%
11.9%
Capex Intensity
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.0%
2.0%
Q3 25
2.4%
2.7%
Q2 25
1.8%
1.7%
Q1 25
4.5%
2.0%
Q4 24
2.0%
3.0%
Q3 24
4.4%
1.9%
Q2 24
3.7%
1.7%
Cash Conversion
BE
BE
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
293.18×
4.50×
Q3 25
0.26×
Q2 25
4.61×
Q1 25
1.05×
Q4 24
4.60×
7.05×
Q3 24
1.26×
Q2 24
2.87×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BE
BE

Product$653.3M87%
Service$61.9M8%
Installation$25.9M3%
Electricity$9.9M1%

PATK
PATK

Recreational Vehicle$276.3M30%
Distribution$222.4M24%
Marine$141.9M15%
Industrial$110.8M12%
Powersports$104.8M11%
Manufactured Housing$67.9M7%

Related Comparisons