vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Beam Global (BEEM) and EnerSys (ENS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EnerSys is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.1M vs $9.0M, roughly 101.6× Beam Global). EnerSys runs the higher net margin — 9.8% vs -25.8%, a 35.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Beam Global posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs 1.4%). EnerSys produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.3M vs $-3.8M). Over the past eight quarters, EnerSys's revenue compounded faster (0.5% CAGR vs -21.2%).
Suntory Global Spirits Inc., formerly known as Beam Suntory, Inc., and before that as Beam, Inc., is an American beverage company that is a subsidiary of Suntory Holdings, a Japanese multinational beverage conglomerate. The company produces alcoholic beverages.
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
BEEM vs ENS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M | $919.1M |
| Net Profit | $-2.3M | $90.4M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | -29.3% | 13.5% |
| Net Margin | -25.8% | 9.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.7% | 1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 49.6% | -21.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | $919.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $951.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $893.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $974.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $906.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | $883.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $852.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $910.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | $90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.5M | $96.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.6M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $70.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $60.9M |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 31.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | 27.9% |
| Q4 25 | -29.3% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -60.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.3% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | -25.8% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.5% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.28 | $1.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $2.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.31 | $2.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $2.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $1.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.21 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $969.0K | $450.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.8M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $42.7M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $969.0K | $450.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $388.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $346.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $343.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | $463.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $407.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $344.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $333.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $802.0M |
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.9M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $42.7M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.6M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.7M | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.8M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.5M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.9M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.7M | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.8M | $184.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.8M | $171.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -42.3% | 18.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.8M | $441.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $184.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $218.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-318.0K | $968.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $135.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $859.0K | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $197.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $-32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $104.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.0K | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -42.3% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -87.9% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.28× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEEM
Segment breakdown not available.
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
