vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Beam Global (BEEM) and Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (EOSE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($58.0M vs $9.0M, roughly 6.4× Beam Global). Beam Global runs the higher net margin — -25.8% vs -207.7%, a 181.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (699.6% vs 6.7%). Beam Global produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.8M vs $-75.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (196.4% CAGR vs -21.2%).
Suntory Global Spirits Inc., formerly known as Beam Suntory, Inc., and before that as Beam, Inc., is an American beverage company that is a subsidiary of Suntory Holdings, a Japanese multinational beverage conglomerate. The company produces alcoholic beverages.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is an energy storage solutions provider that designs, produces and deploys safe long-duration zinc-based battery systems. It serves utility, commercial, industrial and microgrid customers across North America, Europe and Asia, supporting grid stability and renewable energy integration.
BEEM vs EOSE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M | $58.0M |
| Net Profit | $-2.3M | $-120.5M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | -93.8% |
| Operating Margin | -29.3% | -140.1% |
| Net Margin | -25.8% | -207.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.7% | 699.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 49.6% | 55.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | $854.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $898.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | $-120.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-641.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3M | $-222.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.5M | $15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.6M | $-268.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $-342.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $-28.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $-46.7M |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | -93.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | -111.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | -203.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | -234.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | -324.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | -2916.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | -1472.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | -327.6% |
| Q4 25 | -29.3% | -140.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.2% | -200.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.1% | -419.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.8% | -506.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -60.1% | -712.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | -6244.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.3% | -3233.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | -623.2% |
| Q4 25 | -25.8% | -207.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.1% | -2102.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | -1463.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -245.5% | 144.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.5% | -3696.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | -40148.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.2% | -3137.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.9% | -707.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $-4.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.28 | $-1.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.31 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $-1.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.21 | $-0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $969.0K | $568.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $813.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.8M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $42.7M | $885.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $969.0K | $568.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $120.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | $74.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $52.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $31.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $813.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $448.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $445.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $325.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $316.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $153.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $-2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | $-942.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.3M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.4M | $-573.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.4M | $-190.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.9M | $-147.7M |
| Q4 25 | $42.7M | $885.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.6M | $328.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.7M | $361.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.8M | $263.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.5M | $260.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | $216.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.9M | $248.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.7M | $155.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.8M | $-50.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.8M | $-75.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -42.3% | -129.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 43.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.8M | $-265.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $-50.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $-65.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-318.0K | $-66.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $859.0K | $-42.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $-44.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $-26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $-40.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $-75.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $-82.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $-73.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-33.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.0K | $-55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $-54.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $-44.5M |
| Q4 25 | -42.3% | -129.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -87.9% | -271.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | -480.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.7% | -323.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | -769.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | -6347.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | -3628.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.5% | -674.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 55.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 46.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 47.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 180.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 1143.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 695.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 61.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
