vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) and Cintas (CTAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KE Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.2B vs $2.8B, roughly 1.2× Cintas). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 3.2%, a 14.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, KE Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 7.9%).
KE Holdings Inc., operating under the well-known Beike brand, is a leading integrated online and offline residential service platform based in China. It offers a full range of services including second-hand property brokerage, new housing sales agency, home rental, renovation, and related financial consultation to meet diverse housing-related demands of consumers across multiple scenarios.
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
BEKE vs CTAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.2B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $104.9M | $495.3M |
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 23.4% |
| Net Margin | 3.2% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 9.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $495.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.4M | $491.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $448.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.9M | $463.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $448.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.5M | $452.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $414.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.8M | $397.6M |
| Q4 25 | 21.4% | 50.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 50.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 50.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 16.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $200.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $16.8B | $10.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $200.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $138.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $264.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $243.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $122.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $342.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $128.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | $16.8B | $10.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0B | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9B | $9.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5B | $9.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.58× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $531.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $425.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 15.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.8B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $531.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $414.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $635.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-546.4M | $622.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $441.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $466.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $693.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $657.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $425.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $312.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $521.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $522.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $373.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $591.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $550.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.64× | 1.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.38× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.65× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEKE
| New home transaction services | $932.6M | 29% |
| Existing home transaction services | $841.5M | 26% |
| Home rental services | $804.4M | 25% |
| Home renovation and furnishing | $604.0M | 19% |
| Emerging and other services | $55.6M | 2% |
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |
