vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) and JONES LANG LASALLE INC (JLL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JONES LANG LASALLE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $3.2B, roughly 2.3× KE Holdings Inc.). JONES LANG LASALLE INC runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 3.2%, a 2.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, JONES LANG LASALLE INC's revenue compounded faster (21.9% CAGR vs 9.8%).
KE Holdings Inc., operating under the well-known Beike brand, is a leading integrated online and offline residential service platform based in China. It offers a full range of services including second-hand property brokerage, new housing sales agency, home rental, renovation, and related financial consultation to meet diverse housing-related demands of consumers across multiple scenarios.
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is a global real estate services company headquartered in Chicago. The company has offices in 80 countries. It offers investment management services worldwide, including services to institutional and retail investors, and to high-net-worth individuals, as well as technology products through JLL Technologies, and venture capital investments through its PropTech fund, JLL Spark. The company is ranked 188 on the Fortune 500.
BEKE vs JLL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.2B | $7.6B |
| Net Profit | $104.9M | $401.8M |
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 6.7% |
| Net Margin | 3.2% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 11.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 66.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $8.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $401.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.4M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.9M | $57.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $241.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.5M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $84.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.8M | $66.1M |
| Q4 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $599.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $7.5B |
| Total Assets | $16.8B | $17.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $599.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $428.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $401.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $432.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $416.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $437.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $424.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.1B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | $6.3B |
| Q4 25 | $16.8B | $17.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3B | $17.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0B | $16.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $17.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9B | $15.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5B | $15.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $617.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $332.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-546.4M | $-767.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $927.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $261.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $273.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-677.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.64× | -13.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.84× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.38× | 1.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEKE
| New home transaction services | $932.6M | 29% |
| Existing home transaction services | $841.5M | 26% |
| Home rental services | $804.4M | 25% |
| Home renovation and furnishing | $604.0M | 19% |
| Emerging and other services | $55.6M | 2% |
JLL
| Workplace Management | $3.8B | 50% |
| Project Management | $1.1B | 15% |
| Leasing Advisory | $1.0B | 13% |
| Leasing | $964.9M | 13% |
| Property Management | $480.2M | 6% |
| Portfolio Services And Other | $152.1M | 2% |
| Advisory Fees | $98.1M | 1% |
| Loan Servicing | $42.2M | 1% |
| Transaction Fees Other | $16.4M | 0% |
