vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JONES LANG LASALLE INC (JLL) and Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JONES LANG LASALLE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $736.0M, roughly 10.3× Opendoor Technologies Inc.). JONES LANG LASALLE INC runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs -148.9%, a 154.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JONES LANG LASALLE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.7% vs -32.1%). Over the past eight quarters, JONES LANG LASALLE INC's revenue compounded faster (21.9% CAGR vs -21.1%).
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is a global real estate services company headquartered in Chicago. The company has offices in 80 countries. It offers investment management services worldwide, including services to institutional and retail investors, and to high-net-worth individuals, as well as technology products through JLL Technologies, and venture capital investments through its PropTech fund, JLL Spark. The company is ranked 188 on the Fortune 500.
Opendoor Technologies Inc. is an online company that buys and sells residential real estate. Headquartered in San Francisco, it makes instant cash offers on homes through an online process, makes repairs on the properties it purchases and re-lists them for sale. It also provides mobile application-based home buying services along with financing. As of November 2021, the company operates in 44 markets in the US.
JLL vs OPEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $736.0M |
| Net Profit | $401.8M | $-1.1B |
| Gross Margin | — | 7.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | -20.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | -148.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.7% | -32.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 66.6% | -869.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $8.33 | $-1.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $736.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $915.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $401.8M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.4M | $-90.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.5M | $-29.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.5M | $-85.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.2M | $-113.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.1M | $-78.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.4M | $-92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.1M | $-109.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | -20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | -4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | -7.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | -148.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | -7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | -10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | -9.2% |
| Q4 25 | $8.33 | $-1.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.61 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.32 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.14 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.98 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.20 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.75 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.37 | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $599.1M | $962.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.5B | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $17.8B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $599.1M | $962.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $428.9M | $962.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $401.4M | $789.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $432.4M | $559.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.3M | $679.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $437.8M | $837.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $424.4M | $809.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $396.7M | $990.0M |
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $811.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $631.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $645.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $713.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $801.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $845.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3B | $899.0M |
| Q4 25 | $17.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.5B | $3.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.0B | $70.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $67.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.52× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $70.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $617.1M | $435.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.8M | $823.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-767.6M | $-279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $927.3M | $-80.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.6M | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.9M | $-399.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-677.5M | $-178.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $432.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $821.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-283.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-83.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $56.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-407.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-186.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -26.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -15.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.25× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JLL
| Workplace Management | $3.8B | 50% |
| Project Management | $1.1B | 15% |
| Leasing Advisory | $1.0B | 13% |
| Leasing | $964.9M | 13% |
| Property Management | $480.2M | 6% |
| Portfolio Services And Other | $152.1M | 2% |
| Advisory Fees | $98.1M | 1% |
| Loan Servicing | $42.2M | 1% |
| Transaction Fees Other | $16.4M | 0% |
OPEN
Segment breakdown not available.
