vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and DXC Technology Co (DXC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DXC Technology Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.2B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.9× Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.). Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 5.9% vs 3.4%, a 2.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs -1.0%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
DXC Technology Company is an American multinational information technology (IT) services and consulting company headquartered in Ashburn, Virginia.
BEP vs DXC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $3.2B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $107.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 8.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | -1.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | 87.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $0.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $36.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $264.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $57.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $42.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-200.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.61 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $1.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $13.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | $414.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $359.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 11.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | 3.87× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $414.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $186.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $315.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $195.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $238.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $280.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $359.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $365.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $143.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $238.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $568.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $154.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $190.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $242.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | 11.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEP
Segment breakdown not available.
DXC
| GIS Segment | $1.6B | 50% |
| CES Segment | $1.3B | 40% |
| Insurance Segment | $321.0M | 10% |
