vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. (REYN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.6× Reynolds Consumer Products Inc.). Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. runs the higher net margin — 11.4% vs 5.9%, a 5.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs 1.2%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
The Rival Company is an American manufacturer of small appliances that produces products under the Bionaire, Crock-Pot, Fasco, Patton, Pollenex, Rival, Simer, and White Mountain brands. It became a wholly owned subsidiary of Holmes Products Corp. in 1999, and later became a brand of Sunbeam Products, a subsidiary of Jarden Corporation, which purchased Holmes in 2005. Jarden, in turn, merged with Newell Rubbermaid in 2016. It is now part of the Newell Brands company.
BEP vs REYN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $100.0M | $118.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 14.8% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 11.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | 1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 213.6% | -1.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $931.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $938.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $818.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $910.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $930.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $833.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $118.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $97.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $49.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $147.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.3B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $98.6B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $147.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $58.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $137.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $96.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $101.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $135.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.6B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.92× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $379.0M | $237.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $200.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.79× | 2.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $316.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $237.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0M | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $182.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $124.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.0M | $84.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $99.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $200.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $141.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $65.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $70.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEP
Segment breakdown not available.
REYN
| Reynolds Cooking And Baking | $397.0M | 38% |
| Hefty Waste And Storage | $247.0M | 24% |
| Tableware Products | $229.0M | 22% |
| Presto Products | $164.0M | 16% |
