vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC) and CALERES INC (CAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($952.0M vs $790.1M, roughly 1.2× CALERES INC). CALERES INC runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -152.0%, a 152.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -3.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
BEPC vs CAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $952.0M | $790.1M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $2.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | -152.0% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -326.8% | -94.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $790.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $658.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $952.0M | $614.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $639.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $740.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $683.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $659.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $697.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4B | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-339.0M | $30.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 43.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -152.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $556.0M | $34.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.8B | $616.8M |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $191.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.0M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $21.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $605.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $599.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $598.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $606.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $570.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $560.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $139.0M | $-1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $14.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.0M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $43.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $68.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $32.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEPC
Segment breakdown not available.
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
