vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC) and Magnera Corp (MAGN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($952.0M vs $792.0M, roughly 1.2× Magnera Corp). Magnera Corp runs the higher net margin — -4.3% vs -152.0%, a 147.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Magnera Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs -3.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
BEPC vs MAGN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $952.0M | $792.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $-34.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.8% |
| Net Margin | -152.0% | -4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | 12.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -326.8% | 43.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.95 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $792.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $952.0M | $839.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $824.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $702.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $332.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $556.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $558.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $329.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4B | $-18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-41.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-60.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-339.0M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-19.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -152.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -6.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.95 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.51 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.69 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $556.0M | $264.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.8B | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $3.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.86× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $264.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | $276.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $282.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $215.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $230.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.0M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $52.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $877.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $884.7M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $867.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 0.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $139.0M | $2.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-58.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.0M | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEPC
Segment breakdown not available.
MAGN
| Other | $451.0M | 57% |
| United States And Canada | $341.0M | 43% |
