vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Better Home & Finance Holding Co (BETR) and Cytek Biosciences, Inc. (CTKB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cytek Biosciences, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.1M vs $44.3M, roughly 1.4× Better Home & Finance Holding Co). Cytek Biosciences, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -70.9% vs -3349.0%, a 3278.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Better Home & Finance Holding Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.4% vs 8.1%). Cytek Biosciences, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.8M vs $-167.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Better Home & Finance Holding Co's revenue compounded faster (41.1% CAGR vs 17.7%).
Bajaj Finance Limited (BFL) is an Indian deposit-taking non-banking financial company (NBFC-UL) headquartered in Pune. It has 110.64 million customers and holds assets under management worth ₹462,250 crore (US$55 billion), as of September 2025.
Cytek Biosciences, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-performance flow cytometry systems, associated reagents and analysis software. Its solutions serve life science research, clinical diagnostics and biopharmaceutical sectors, with a global customer base across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.
BETR vs CTKB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.3M | $62.1M |
| Net Profit | $-39.9M | $-44.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3376.8% | -9.0% |
| Net Margin | -3349.0% | -70.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 77.4% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.6% | -557.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.52 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.3M | $62.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.1M | $45.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | $41.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0M | $57.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.0M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $46.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.3M | $44.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-39.9M | $-44.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-39.1M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.3M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.6M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.2M | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-54.2M | $941.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.4M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-51.5M | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 52.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 56.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.3% |
| Q4 25 | -3376.8% | -9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -88.9% | -17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.9% | -23.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -154.9% | -36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1428.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -186.5% | -8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -127.6% | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -230.8% | -23.9% |
| Q4 25 | -3349.0% | -70.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -89.2% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -82.2% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -155.3% | -27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1437.5% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -187.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -128.2% | -22.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -231.4% | -13.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.52 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.56 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.39 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.33 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.92 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.58 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.74 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.41 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $203.4M | $90.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.2M | $341.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $461.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $203.4M | $90.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.8M | $93.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.5M | $75.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $228.0M | $95.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.9M | $98.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262.1M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $378.8M | $177.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.6M | $168.8M |
| Q4 25 | $37.2M | $341.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | $378.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.6M | $377.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-102.1M | $379.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-58.2M | $395.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.0K | $385.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9M | $389.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.3M | $392.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $461.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $494.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $493.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $482.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $913.1M | $499.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $845.2M | $491.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $957.9M | $483.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $841.6M | $492.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-166.6M | $-771.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-167.8M | $-1.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -378.6% | -2.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-277.9M | $-8.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-166.6M | $-771.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.3M | $108.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.2M | $-125.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-380.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.6M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-220.6M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.8M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-167.8M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.7M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.4M | $-974.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-383.4M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-221.8M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-43.3M | $3.4M |
| Q4 25 | -378.6% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | -8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | -3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -176.3% | -2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1534.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -40.5% | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -687.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -194.5% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BETR
Segment breakdown not available.
CTKB
| Products | $46.6M | 75% |
| Services | $15.5M | 25% |
