vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Brown–Forman (BF.B) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.2× Brown–Forman). Brown–Forman runs the higher net margin — 21.6% vs 15.5%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs -5.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs -1.6%).

Brown-Forman Corporation is an American family-controlled publicly traded company, one of the largest in the spirits and wine business. Based in Louisville, Kentucky, it manufactures several very well known brands throughout the world, including Jack Daniel's, Old Forester, Woodford Reserve, GlenDronach, BenRiach, Glenglassaugh, Herradura, Korbel, and Chambord. Brown-Forman formerly owned Southern Comfort and Tuaca before selling them off in 2016.

Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.

BF.B vs GEN — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GEN
GEN
1.2× larger
GEN
$1.2B
$1.0B
BF.B
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GEN
GEN
+33.9% gap
GEN
28.5%
-5.4%
BF.B
Higher net margin
BF.B
BF.B
6.1% more per $
BF.B
21.6%
15.5%
GEN
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GEN
GEN
Annualised
GEN
13.2%
-1.6%
BF.B

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Revenue
$1.0B
$1.2B
Net Profit
$224.0M
$192.0M
Gross Margin
59.4%
78.4%
Operating Margin
29.4%
34.9%
Net Margin
21.6%
15.5%
Revenue YoY
-5.4%
28.5%
Net Profit YoY
-13.2%
6.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.47
$0.31

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
$1.2B
Q4 25
$1.0B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$924.0M
$1.3B
Q2 25
$894.0M
Q1 25
$1.0B
$1.0B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$986.0M
Q3 24
$951.0M
$974.0M
Q2 24
$964.0M
$965.0M
Net Profit
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
$192.0M
Q4 25
$224.0M
$134.0M
Q3 25
$170.0M
$135.0M
Q2 25
$146.0M
Q1 25
$270.0M
$142.0M
Q4 24
$258.0M
$159.0M
Q3 24
$195.0M
$161.0M
Q2 24
$266.0M
$181.0M
Gross Margin
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
78.4%
Q4 25
59.4%
78.2%
Q3 25
59.7%
78.8%
Q2 25
57.4%
Q1 25
59.8%
80.3%
Q4 24
59.0%
80.4%
Q3 24
59.4%
80.1%
Q2 24
59.0%
80.3%
Operating Margin
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
34.9%
Q4 25
29.4%
35.9%
Q3 25
28.1%
35.5%
Q2 25
22.9%
Q1 25
27.1%
41.3%
Q4 24
31.1%
37.9%
Q3 24
29.5%
41.3%
Q2 24
38.9%
43.2%
Net Margin
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
15.5%
Q4 25
21.6%
11.0%
Q3 25
18.4%
10.7%
Q2 25
16.3%
Q1 25
26.1%
14.1%
Q4 24
23.6%
16.1%
Q3 24
20.5%
16.5%
Q2 24
27.6%
18.8%
EPS (diluted)
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
$0.31
Q4 25
$0.47
$0.21
Q3 25
$0.36
$0.22
Q2 25
$0.31
Q1 25
$0.57
$0.22
Q4 24
$0.55
$0.26
Q3 24
$0.41
$0.26
Q2 24
$0.56
$0.29

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$319.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.4B
$8.4B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.1B
$2.3B
Total Assets
$8.2B
$15.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.59×
3.61×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
Q4 25
$319.0M
Q3 25
$471.0M
Q2 25
$444.0M
Q1 25
$599.0M
$1.0B
Q4 24
$416.0M
$883.0M
Q3 24
$416.0M
$737.0M
Q2 24
$446.0M
$644.0M
Total Debt
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
$8.4B
Q4 25
$2.4B
$8.7B
Q3 25
$2.4B
$8.9B
Q2 25
$2.4B
Q1 25
$2.7B
$8.3B
Q4 24
$2.7B
$8.5B
Q3 24
$2.7B
$8.5B
Q2 24
$2.7B
$8.5B
Stockholders' Equity
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
$2.3B
Q4 25
$4.1B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$4.0B
$2.4B
Q2 25
$4.0B
Q1 25
$3.8B
$2.3B
Q4 24
$3.7B
$2.2B
Q3 24
$3.5B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$3.5B
$2.0B
Total Assets
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
$15.8B
Q4 25
$8.2B
$16.1B
Q3 25
$8.2B
$16.4B
Q2 25
$8.1B
Q1 25
$8.1B
$15.5B
Q4 24
$8.3B
$15.4B
Q3 24
$8.2B
$15.5B
Q2 24
$8.2B
$15.4B
Debt / Equity
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
3.61×
Q4 25
0.59×
3.54×
Q3 25
0.61×
3.75×
Q2 25
0.61×
Q1 25
0.70×
3.64×
Q4 24
0.73×
3.94×
Q3 24
0.77×
4.06×
Q2 24
0.76×
4.33×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$132.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$107.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
10.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.59×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$610.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
Q4 25
$132.0M
$541.0M
Q3 25
$160.0M
$409.0M
Q2 25
$152.0M
Q1 25
$317.0M
$473.0M
Q4 24
$112.0M
$326.0M
Q3 24
$17.0M
$158.0M
Q2 24
$285.0M
$264.0M
Free Cash Flow
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
Q4 25
$107.0M
$535.0M
Q3 25
$129.0M
$405.0M
Q2 25
$102.0M
Q1 25
$272.0M
$470.0M
Q4 24
$81.0M
$318.0M
Q3 24
$-24.0M
$156.0M
Q2 24
$205.0M
$262.0M
FCF Margin
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
Q4 25
10.3%
43.9%
Q3 25
14.0%
32.2%
Q2 25
11.4%
Q1 25
26.3%
46.5%
Q4 24
7.4%
32.3%
Q3 24
-2.5%
16.0%
Q2 24
21.3%
27.2%
Capex Intensity
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.4%
0.5%
Q3 25
3.4%
0.3%
Q2 25
5.6%
Q1 25
4.3%
0.3%
Q4 24
2.8%
0.8%
Q3 24
4.3%
0.2%
Q2 24
8.3%
0.2%
Cash Conversion
BF.B
BF.B
GEN
GEN
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.59×
4.04×
Q3 25
0.94×
3.03×
Q2 25
1.04×
Q1 25
1.17×
3.33×
Q4 24
0.43×
2.05×
Q3 24
0.09×
0.98×
Q2 24
1.07×
1.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BF.B
BF.B

Whiskey$771.0M74%
Ready To Drink$138.0M13%
Tequila$67.0M6%
Restofportfolio$52.0M5%
Nonbrandedandbulk$8.0M1%

GEN
GEN

Cyber Safety Platform$819.0M66%
Trust Based Solutions$421.0M34%
Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable$4.0M0%

Related Comparisons