vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRIGHT HORIZONS FAMILY SOLUTIONS INC. (BFAM) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $733.7M, roughly 1.7× BRIGHT HORIZONS FAMILY SOLUTIONS INC.). On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 8.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 8.5%).
Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. is a United States–based child-care provider and is the largest provider of employer-sponsored child care. It also provides back-up child care and elder care, tuition program management, education advising, and student loan repayment programs. It is headquartered in Newton, Massachusetts.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
BFAM vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $733.7M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | — | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.3% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.2% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | — | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.8% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.38 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $733.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $802.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $731.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.1M | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $719.1M | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $670.1M | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.6M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.9M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.2M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.0% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.1% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.37 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.95 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.66 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.94 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $140.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $747.6M | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $3.9B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.56× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.3M | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.9M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.2M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $747.6M | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $747.5M | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $797.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $872.7M | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $918.4M | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $925.7M | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $931.9M | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.52× | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.72× | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.66× | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.73× | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $350.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $258.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 35.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $402.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $350.7M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.6M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.2M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.5M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.9M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.4M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.5M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-42.4M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.9M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.2M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.2M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.8M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.3% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.6% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.22× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.45× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.26× | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.16× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.79× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BFAM
Segment breakdown not available.
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
