vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SAUL CENTERS, INC. (BFS) and N-able, Inc. (NABL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
N-able, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($130.3M vs $75.1M, roughly 1.7× SAUL CENTERS, INC.). On growth, N-able, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.8% vs 10.6%). Over the past eight quarters, N-able, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.0% CAGR vs 6.2%).
Saul Centers, Inc. is a self-administered real estate investment trust (REIT) headquartered in the United States. It primarily owns, operates, and develops high-quality shopping centers, mixed-use properties, and multifamily residential assets, with its core portfolio concentrated in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and other select high-growth U.S. regional markets.
Able UK is a British industrial services company specialising in decommissioning of ships and offshore installations.
BFS vs NABL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.1M | $130.3M |
| Net Profit | $6.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | 65.4% | 10.2% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 10.6% | 11.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.15 | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.0M | $131.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.8M | $131.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.9M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.9M | $116.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.9M | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.7M | $113.7M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.7M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6M | $7.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 76.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 80.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.6% | 82.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.2% | 84.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.8% | 83.9% |
| Q4 25 | 65.4% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.1% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.9% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.8% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.0% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.4% | 18.0% |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.6% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.15 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.48 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.45 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.7M | $111.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $468.4M | $393.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $307.8M | $804.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.52× | 0.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $111.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8M | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $93.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | $94.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3M | $85.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $174.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9M | $157.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $139.2M |
| Q4 25 | $468.4M | $393.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $331.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $332.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $332.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $455.8M | $333.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $333.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $334.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $334.5M |
| Q4 25 | $307.8M | $804.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $316.6M | $813.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $322.4M | $809.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $328.4M | $775.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $335.8M | $759.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $341.8M | $765.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $345.7M | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $347.1M | $709.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 1.52× | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.02× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.85× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.70× | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.36× | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.37× | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.17× | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.06× | 0.47× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $99.8M | $25.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $20.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 16.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 15.35× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $75.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $99.8M | $25.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.6M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | $24.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.4M | $19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.2M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.1M | $27.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.8M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.3M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.5M | $24.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.7M | $746.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -42.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.7% | 20.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.6% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 66.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 68.3% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 15.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | 17.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.10× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.83× | 2.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.22× | 2.89× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.48× | 0.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BFS
Segment breakdown not available.
NABL
| Transferred Over Time | $121.9M | 94% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 6% |
| Other Revenue | $1.3M | 1% |
