vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Dynatrace, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($515.5M vs $439.3M, roughly 1.2× B&G Foods, Inc.). Dynatrace, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs -4.4%, a 12.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dynatrace, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs -4.7%). Dynatrace, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.2M vs $-70.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs -12.8%).

B&G Foods, Inc. is an American branded foods holding company based in Parsippany, New Jersey. The company was formed in 1996 to acquire Bloch & Guggenheimer, a Manhattan-based producer of pickles, relish and condiments which had been founded in 1889.

Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.

BGS vs DT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
DT
DT
1.2× larger
DT
$515.5M
$439.3M
BGS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
DT
DT
+22.9% gap
DT
18.2%
-4.7%
BGS
Higher net margin
DT
DT
12.1% more per $
DT
7.8%
-4.4%
BGS
More free cash flow
DT
DT
$98.0M more FCF
DT
$27.2M
$-70.7M
BGS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
DT
DT
Annualised
DT
16.3%
-12.8%
BGS

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Revenue
$439.3M
$515.5M
Net Profit
$-19.1M
$40.1M
Gross Margin
22.5%
81.4%
Operating Margin
2.5%
14.1%
Net Margin
-4.4%
7.8%
Revenue YoY
-4.7%
18.2%
Net Profit YoY
-356.5%
-88.9%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.24
$0.13

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
$515.5M
Q3 25
$439.3M
$493.8M
Q2 25
$424.4M
$477.3M
Q1 25
$425.4M
$445.2M
Q4 24
$551.6M
$436.2M
Q3 24
$461.1M
$418.1M
Q2 24
$444.6M
$399.2M
Q1 24
$475.2M
$380.8M
Net Profit
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
$40.1M
Q3 25
$-19.1M
$57.2M
Q2 25
$-9.8M
$48.0M
Q1 25
$835.0K
$39.3M
Q4 24
$-222.4M
$361.8M
Q3 24
$7.5M
$44.0M
Q2 24
$3.9M
$38.6M
Q1 24
$-40.2M
$37.9M
Gross Margin
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
81.4%
Q3 25
22.5%
81.8%
Q2 25
20.5%
82.1%
Q1 25
21.2%
80.9%
Q4 24
21.5%
81.1%
Q3 24
22.2%
81.4%
Q2 24
20.7%
81.3%
Q1 24
22.9%
81.1%
Operating Margin
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
14.1%
Q3 25
2.5%
14.8%
Q2 25
5.2%
13.1%
Q1 25
8.4%
9.6%
Q4 24
-46.6%
10.9%
Q3 24
11.1%
11.2%
Q2 24
9.9%
10.5%
Q1 24
-3.3%
6.1%
Net Margin
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
7.8%
Q3 25
-4.4%
11.6%
Q2 25
-2.3%
10.0%
Q1 25
0.2%
8.8%
Q4 24
-40.3%
82.9%
Q3 24
1.6%
10.5%
Q2 24
0.9%
9.7%
Q1 24
-8.5%
10.0%
EPS (diluted)
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
$0.13
Q3 25
$-0.24
$0.19
Q2 25
$-0.12
$0.16
Q1 25
$0.01
$0.12
Q4 24
$-2.81
$1.19
Q3 24
$0.09
$0.15
Q2 24
$0.05
$0.13
Q1 24
$-0.51
$0.13

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$60.9M
$1.2B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.0B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$470.7M
$2.7B
Total Assets
$2.9B
$4.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
4.30×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
$1.2B
Q3 25
$60.9M
$1.3B
Q2 25
$54.1M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$61.2M
$1.1B
Q4 24
$50.6M
$1.0B
Q3 24
$54.7M
$1.0B
Q2 24
$40.3M
$1.0B
Q1 24
$42.5M
$836.9M
Total Debt
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
Q3 25
$2.0B
Q2 25
$2.0B
Q1 25
$2.0B
Q4 24
$2.0B
Q3 24
$2.1B
Q2 24
$2.0B
Q1 24
$2.0B
Stockholders' Equity
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
$2.7B
Q3 25
$470.7M
$2.8B
Q2 25
$501.4M
$2.7B
Q1 25
$513.1M
$2.6B
Q4 24
$524.8M
$2.6B
Q3 24
$755.3M
$2.1B
Q2 24
$765.0M
$2.1B
Q1 24
$781.2M
$2.0B
Total Assets
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
$4.1B
Q3 25
$2.9B
$4.1B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$4.1B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$4.1B
Q4 24
$3.0B
$3.7B
Q3 24
$3.4B
$3.3B
Q2 24
$3.4B
$3.3B
Q1 24
$3.4B
$3.4B
Debt / Equity
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
Q3 25
4.30×
Q2 25
3.97×
Q1 25
3.91×
Q4 24
3.85×
Q3 24
2.75×
Q2 24
2.67×
Q1 24
2.61×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-64.6M
$33.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-70.7M
$27.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-16.1%
5.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.4%
1.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.84×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$54.8M
$465.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
$33.8M
Q3 25
$-64.6M
$32.0M
Q2 25
$17.8M
$269.7M
Q1 25
$52.7M
$162.8M
Q4 24
$80.3M
$42.2M
Q3 24
$4.2M
$23.6M
Q2 24
$11.3M
$230.7M
Q1 24
$35.1M
$131.7M
Free Cash Flow
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
$27.2M
Q3 25
$-70.7M
$27.8M
Q2 25
$11.5M
$262.2M
Q1 25
$42.4M
$148.2M
Q4 24
$71.7M
$37.6M
Q3 24
$-679.0K
$20.1M
Q2 24
$5.2M
$227.4M
Q1 24
$27.5M
$121.9M
FCF Margin
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
5.3%
Q3 25
-16.1%
5.6%
Q2 25
2.7%
54.9%
Q1 25
10.0%
33.3%
Q4 24
13.0%
8.6%
Q3 24
-0.1%
4.8%
Q2 24
1.2%
57.0%
Q1 24
5.8%
32.0%
Capex Intensity
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
1.3%
Q3 25
1.4%
0.8%
Q2 25
1.5%
1.6%
Q1 25
2.4%
3.3%
Q4 24
1.6%
1.1%
Q3 24
1.0%
0.8%
Q2 24
1.4%
0.8%
Q1 24
1.6%
2.6%
Cash Conversion
BGS
BGS
DT
DT
Q4 25
0.84×
Q3 25
0.56×
Q2 25
5.62×
Q1 25
63.17×
4.14×
Q4 24
0.12×
Q3 24
0.56×
0.54×
Q2 24
2.87×
5.97×
Q1 24
3.47×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BGS
BGS

Specialty Segment$150.5M34%
Meals Segment$110.0M25%
Spices And Flavor Solutions Segment$101.4M23%
Frozen And Vegetables Segment$77.4M18%

DT
DT

Subscription And Circulation$493.4M96%
Services$22.1M4%

Related Comparisons