vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Freedom Holding Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($628.6M vs $439.3M, roughly 1.4× B&G Foods, Inc.). Freedom Holding Corp. runs the higher net margin — 12.1% vs -4.4%, a 16.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Freedom Holding Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.1% vs -4.7%). Freedom Holding Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($651.7M vs $-70.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Freedom Holding Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs -12.8%).

B&G Foods, Inc. is an American branded foods holding company based in Parsippany, New Jersey. The company was formed in 1996 to acquire Bloch & Guggenheimer, a Manhattan-based producer of pickles, relish and condiments which had been founded in 1889.

Freedom Holding Corp. is an investment conglomerate registered in Nevada, USA. The company provides a range of services in retail financial securities brokerage and trading, asset management, capital markets, investment research and counseling, investment banking and underwriting services, mortgages, insurance, banking and other consumer services. Its main area of focus is in the American stock market, as well as the markets of Europe and Central Asia, mainly Kazakhstan.

BGS vs FRHC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FRHC
FRHC
1.4× larger
FRHC
$628.6M
$439.3M
BGS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FRHC
FRHC
+0.7% gap
FRHC
-4.1%
-4.7%
BGS
Higher net margin
FRHC
FRHC
16.5% more per $
FRHC
12.1%
-4.4%
BGS
More free cash flow
FRHC
FRHC
$722.4M more FCF
FRHC
$651.7M
$-70.7M
BGS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FRHC
FRHC
Annualised
FRHC
16.3%
-12.8%
BGS

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Revenue
$439.3M
$628.6M
Net Profit
$-19.1M
$76.2M
Gross Margin
22.5%
96.0%
Operating Margin
2.5%
14.9%
Net Margin
-4.4%
12.1%
Revenue YoY
-4.7%
-4.1%
Net Profit YoY
-356.5%
-2.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.24
$1.25

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
$628.6M
Q3 25
$439.3M
$526.1M
Q2 25
$424.4M
$533.4M
Q1 25
$425.4M
$363.7M
Q4 24
$551.6M
$655.2M
Q3 24
$461.1M
$580.9M
Q2 24
$444.6M
$450.7M
Q1 24
$475.2M
$464.7M
Net Profit
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
$76.2M
Q3 25
$-19.1M
$38.7M
Q2 25
$-9.8M
$30.4M
Q1 25
$835.0K
$-142.7M
Q4 24
$-222.4M
$78.3M
Q3 24
$7.5M
$114.7M
Q2 24
$3.9M
$34.4M
Q1 24
$-40.2M
$95.2M
Gross Margin
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
96.0%
Q3 25
22.5%
97.1%
Q2 25
20.5%
97.4%
Q1 25
21.2%
96.6%
Q4 24
21.5%
98.6%
Q3 24
22.2%
99.1%
Q2 24
20.7%
99.0%
Q1 24
22.9%
Operating Margin
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
14.9%
Q3 25
2.5%
11.5%
Q2 25
5.2%
7.6%
Q1 25
8.4%
-42.7%
Q4 24
-46.6%
15.0%
Q3 24
11.1%
22.1%
Q2 24
9.9%
9.2%
Q1 24
-3.3%
22.5%
Net Margin
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
12.1%
Q3 25
-4.4%
7.4%
Q2 25
-2.3%
5.7%
Q1 25
0.2%
-39.2%
Q4 24
-40.3%
11.9%
Q3 24
1.6%
19.7%
Q2 24
0.9%
7.6%
Q1 24
-8.5%
20.5%
EPS (diluted)
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
$1.25
Q3 25
$-0.24
$0.63
Q2 25
$-0.12
$0.50
Q1 25
$0.01
$-2.35
Q4 24
$-2.81
$1.29
Q3 24
$0.09
$1.89
Q2 24
$0.05
$0.57
Q1 24
$-0.51
$1.60

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$60.9M
$869.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.0B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$470.7M
$1.4B
Total Assets
$2.9B
$12.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
4.30×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
$869.2M
Q3 25
$60.9M
$636.0M
Q2 25
$54.1M
$567.9M
Q1 25
$61.2M
$837.3M
Q4 24
$50.6M
$577.9M
Q3 24
$54.7M
$569.2M
Q2 24
$40.3M
$718.7M
Q1 24
$42.5M
$545.1M
Total Debt
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
Q3 25
$2.0B
Q2 25
$2.0B
Q1 25
$2.0B
Q4 24
$2.0B
Q3 24
$2.1B
Q2 24
$2.0B
Q1 24
$2.0B
Stockholders' Equity
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
$1.4B
Q3 25
$470.7M
$1.2B
Q2 25
$501.4M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$513.1M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$524.8M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$755.3M
$1.3B
Q2 24
$765.0M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$781.2M
$1.2B
Total Assets
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
$12.4B
Q3 25
$2.9B
$10.3B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$9.7B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$9.9B
Q4 24
$3.0B
$9.1B
Q3 24
$3.4B
$8.8B
Q2 24
$3.4B
$8.5B
Q1 24
$3.4B
$8.3B
Debt / Equity
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
Q3 25
4.30×
Q2 25
3.97×
Q1 25
3.91×
Q4 24
3.85×
Q3 24
2.75×
Q2 24
2.67×
Q1 24
2.61×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-64.6M
$717.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-70.7M
$651.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-16.1%
103.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.4%
10.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
9.42×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$54.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
$717.8M
Q3 25
$-64.6M
$535.3M
Q2 25
$17.8M
$480.8M
Q1 25
$52.7M
$1.3B
Q4 24
$80.3M
$-72.8M
Q3 24
$4.2M
$-438.0M
Q2 24
$11.3M
$854.1M
Q1 24
$35.1M
$309.0M
Free Cash Flow
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
$651.7M
Q3 25
$-70.7M
$456.4M
Q2 25
$11.5M
$450.0M
Q1 25
$42.4M
Q4 24
$71.7M
$-92.7M
Q3 24
$-679.0K
$-447.5M
Q2 24
$5.2M
$829.9M
Q1 24
$27.5M
FCF Margin
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
103.7%
Q3 25
-16.1%
86.7%
Q2 25
2.7%
84.4%
Q1 25
10.0%
Q4 24
13.0%
-14.1%
Q3 24
-0.1%
-77.0%
Q2 24
1.2%
184.1%
Q1 24
5.8%
Capex Intensity
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
10.5%
Q3 25
1.4%
15.0%
Q2 25
1.5%
5.8%
Q1 25
2.4%
Q4 24
1.6%
3.0%
Q3 24
1.0%
1.6%
Q2 24
1.4%
5.4%
Q1 24
1.6%
Cash Conversion
BGS
BGS
FRHC
FRHC
Q4 25
9.42×
Q3 25
13.82×
Q2 25
15.82×
Q1 25
63.17×
Q4 24
-0.93×
Q3 24
0.56×
-3.82×
Q2 24
2.87×
24.83×
Q1 24
3.24×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BGS
BGS

Specialty Segment$150.5M34%
Meals Segment$110.0M25%
Spices And Flavor Solutions Segment$101.4M23%
Frozen And Vegetables Segment$77.4M18%

FRHC
FRHC

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons