vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $439.3M, roughly 1.2× B&G Foods, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs -4.4%, a 32.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -4.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs -12.8%).

B&G Foods, Inc. is an American branded foods holding company based in Parsippany, New Jersey. The company was formed in 1996 to acquire Bloch & Guggenheimer, a Manhattan-based producer of pickles, relish and condiments which had been founded in 1889.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

BGS vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.2× larger
KIM
$542.5M
$439.3M
BGS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+8.0% gap
KIM
3.2%
-4.7%
BGS
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
32.2% more per $
KIM
27.9%
-4.4%
BGS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
3.8%
-12.8%
BGS

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$439.3M
$542.5M
Net Profit
$-19.1M
$151.2M
Gross Margin
22.5%
Operating Margin
2.5%
36.4%
Net Margin
-4.4%
27.9%
Revenue YoY
-4.7%
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
-356.5%
-9.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.24

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$542.5M
Q3 25
$439.3M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$424.4M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$425.4M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$551.6M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$461.1M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$444.6M
$500.2M
Q1 24
$475.2M
$503.8M
Net Profit
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$151.2M
Q3 25
$-19.1M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$-9.8M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$835.0K
$132.8M
Q4 24
$-222.4M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$7.5M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$3.9M
$119.7M
Q1 24
$-40.2M
$-11.0M
Gross Margin
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
Q3 25
22.5%
Q2 25
20.5%
Q1 25
21.2%
Q4 24
21.5%
Q3 24
22.2%
Q2 24
20.7%
Q1 24
22.9%
Operating Margin
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
36.4%
Q3 25
2.5%
34.9%
Q2 25
5.2%
39.2%
Q1 25
8.4%
33.6%
Q4 24
-46.6%
31.7%
Q3 24
11.1%
33.7%
Q2 24
9.9%
32.1%
Q1 24
-3.3%
25.9%
Net Margin
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
27.9%
Q3 25
-4.4%
25.7%
Q2 25
-2.3%
31.0%
Q1 25
0.2%
24.8%
Q4 24
-40.3%
31.6%
Q3 24
1.6%
26.8%
Q2 24
0.9%
23.9%
Q1 24
-8.5%
-2.2%
EPS (diluted)
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-0.24
Q2 25
$-0.12
Q1 25
$0.01
Q4 24
$-2.81
Q3 24
$0.09
Q2 24
$0.05
Q1 24
$-0.51

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$60.9M
$211.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.0B
$7.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$470.7M
$10.4B
Total Assets
$2.9B
$19.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
4.30×
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$211.6M
Q3 25
$60.9M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$54.1M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$61.2M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$50.6M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$54.7M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$40.3M
$126.4M
Q1 24
$42.5M
$133.4M
Total Debt
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
$2.0B
Q2 25
$2.0B
Q1 25
$2.0B
Q4 24
$2.0B
$8.0B
Q3 24
$2.1B
Q2 24
$2.0B
Q1 24
$2.0B
Stockholders' Equity
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$10.4B
Q3 25
$470.7M
$10.5B
Q2 25
$501.4M
$10.5B
Q1 25
$513.1M
$10.6B
Q4 24
$524.8M
$10.7B
Q3 24
$755.3M
$10.5B
Q2 24
$765.0M
$10.6B
Q1 24
$781.2M
$10.6B
Total Assets
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$19.7B
Q3 25
$2.9B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$3.0B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$3.4B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$3.4B
$19.5B
Q1 24
$3.4B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
4.30×
Q2 25
3.97×
Q1 25
3.91×
Q4 24
3.85×
0.75×
Q3 24
2.75×
Q2 24
2.67×
Q1 24
2.61×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-64.6M
$258.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-70.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-16.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.4%
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$54.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$258.4M
Q3 25
$-64.6M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$17.8M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$52.7M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$80.3M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$4.2M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$11.3M
$294.1M
Q1 24
$35.1M
$176.1M
Free Cash Flow
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-70.7M
Q2 25
$11.5M
Q1 25
$42.4M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$71.7M
Q3 24
$-679.0K
Q2 24
$5.2M
Q1 24
$27.5M
FCF Margin
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
Q3 25
-16.1%
Q2 25
2.7%
Q1 25
10.0%
38.3%
Q4 24
13.0%
Q3 24
-0.1%
Q2 24
1.2%
Q1 24
5.8%
Capex Intensity
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
0.0%
Q3 25
1.4%
0.0%
Q2 25
1.5%
0.0%
Q1 25
2.4%
3.4%
Q4 24
1.6%
Q3 24
1.0%
Q2 24
1.4%
Q1 24
1.6%
Cash Conversion
BGS
BGS
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
63.17×
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
0.56×
2.18×
Q2 24
2.87×
2.46×
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BGS
BGS

Specialty Segment$150.5M34%
Meals Segment$110.0M25%
Spices And Flavor Solutions Segment$101.4M23%
Frozen And Vegetables Segment$77.4M18%

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons