vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. (SHOO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($749.8M vs $439.3M, roughly 1.7× B&G Foods, Inc.). STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs -4.4%, a 7.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.5% vs -4.7%). STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($80.8M vs $-70.7M). Over the past eight quarters, STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.'s revenue compounded faster (16.7% CAGR vs -12.8%).

B&G Foods, Inc. is an American branded foods holding company based in Parsippany, New Jersey. The company was formed in 1996 to acquire Bloch & Guggenheimer, a Manhattan-based producer of pickles, relish and condiments which had been founded in 1889.

Steven Madden, Ltd. is a publicly traded company that designs and markets shoes and fashion accessories. Based in Long Island City, New York, the company's brands include Dolce Vita, Betsey Johnson, Blondo, BB Dakota and Mad Love. Steve Madden is also a licensee of various brands, including Anne Klein and Superga.

BGS vs SHOO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SHOO
SHOO
1.7× larger
SHOO
$749.8M
$439.3M
BGS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
SHOO
SHOO
+34.3% gap
SHOO
29.5%
-4.7%
BGS
Higher net margin
SHOO
SHOO
7.6% more per $
SHOO
3.3%
-4.4%
BGS
More free cash flow
SHOO
SHOO
$151.5M more FCF
SHOO
$80.8M
$-70.7M
BGS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
SHOO
SHOO
Annualised
SHOO
16.7%
-12.8%
BGS

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Revenue
$439.3M
$749.8M
Net Profit
$-19.1M
$24.7M
Gross Margin
22.5%
42.6%
Operating Margin
2.5%
4.8%
Net Margin
-4.4%
3.3%
Revenue YoY
-4.7%
29.5%
Net Profit YoY
-356.5%
-34.8%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.24
$0.33

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
$749.8M
Q3 25
$439.3M
$664.2M
Q2 25
$424.4M
$556.1M
Q1 25
$425.4M
$551.4M
Q4 24
$551.6M
$578.8M
Q3 24
$461.1M
$621.2M
Q2 24
$444.6M
$521.7M
Q1 24
$475.2M
$550.6M
Net Profit
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
$24.7M
Q3 25
$-19.1M
$20.5M
Q2 25
$-9.8M
$-38.7M
Q1 25
$835.0K
$41.3M
Q4 24
$-222.4M
$37.8M
Q3 24
$7.5M
$55.3M
Q2 24
$3.9M
$36.9M
Q1 24
$-40.2M
$44.6M
Gross Margin
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
42.6%
Q3 25
22.5%
41.8%
Q2 25
20.5%
40.6%
Q1 25
21.2%
41.0%
Q4 24
21.5%
40.7%
Q3 24
22.2%
41.8%
Q2 24
20.7%
41.6%
Q1 24
22.9%
40.8%
Operating Margin
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
4.8%
Q3 25
2.5%
4.7%
Q2 25
5.2%
-7.2%
Q1 25
8.4%
9.7%
Q4 24
-46.6%
8.1%
Q3 24
11.1%
12.0%
Q2 24
9.9%
9.0%
Q1 24
-3.3%
10.3%
Net Margin
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
3.3%
Q3 25
-4.4%
3.1%
Q2 25
-2.3%
-7.0%
Q1 25
0.2%
7.5%
Q4 24
-40.3%
6.5%
Q3 24
1.6%
8.9%
Q2 24
0.9%
7.1%
Q1 24
-8.5%
8.1%
EPS (diluted)
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
$0.33
Q3 25
$-0.24
$0.29
Q2 25
$-0.12
$-0.56
Q1 25
$0.01
$0.57
Q4 24
$-2.81
$0.49
Q3 24
$0.09
$0.77
Q2 24
$0.05
$0.49
Q1 24
$-0.51
$0.60

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$60.9M
$112.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.0B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$470.7M
$866.4M
Total Assets
$2.9B
$1.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
4.30×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
$112.4M
Q3 25
$60.9M
$140.0K
Q2 25
$54.1M
$111.9M
Q1 25
$61.2M
$147.2M
Q4 24
$50.6M
$203.4M
Q3 24
$54.7M
$11.1M
Q2 24
$40.3M
$192.2M
Q1 24
$42.5M
$143.1M
Total Debt
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
Q3 25
$2.0B
Q2 25
$2.0B
Q1 25
$2.0B
Q4 24
$2.0B
Q3 24
$2.1B
Q2 24
$2.0B
Q1 24
$2.0B
Stockholders' Equity
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
$866.4M
Q3 25
$470.7M
$850.8M
Q2 25
$501.4M
$833.2M
Q1 25
$513.1M
$875.3M
Q4 24
$524.8M
$847.7M
Q3 24
$755.3M
$833.9M
Q2 24
$765.0M
$808.3M
Q1 24
$781.2M
$825.2M
Total Assets
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
$1.9B
Q3 25
$2.9B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$3.0B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$3.4B
$1.5B
Q2 24
$3.4B
$1.4B
Q1 24
$3.4B
$1.3B
Debt / Equity
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
Q3 25
4.30×
Q2 25
3.97×
Q1 25
3.91×
Q4 24
3.85×
Q3 24
2.75×
Q2 24
2.67×
Q1 24
2.61×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-64.6M
$91.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-70.7M
$80.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-16.1%
10.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.4%
1.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.70×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$54.8M
$119.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
$91.1M
Q3 25
$-64.6M
$23.4M
Q2 25
$17.8M
$66.5M
Q1 25
$52.7M
$-18.8M
Q4 24
$80.3M
$103.9M
Q3 24
$4.2M
$444.0K
Q2 24
$11.3M
$109.5M
Q1 24
$35.1M
$-15.7M
Free Cash Flow
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
$80.8M
Q3 25
$-70.7M
$8.6M
Q2 25
$11.5M
$58.8M
Q1 25
$42.4M
$-28.7M
Q4 24
$71.7M
$94.6M
Q3 24
$-679.0K
$-6.9M
Q2 24
$5.2M
$104.2M
Q1 24
$27.5M
$-19.7M
FCF Margin
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
10.8%
Q3 25
-16.1%
1.3%
Q2 25
2.7%
10.6%
Q1 25
10.0%
-5.2%
Q4 24
13.0%
16.3%
Q3 24
-0.1%
-1.1%
Q2 24
1.2%
20.0%
Q1 24
5.8%
-3.6%
Capex Intensity
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
1.4%
Q3 25
1.4%
2.2%
Q2 25
1.5%
1.4%
Q1 25
2.4%
1.8%
Q4 24
1.6%
1.6%
Q3 24
1.0%
1.2%
Q2 24
1.4%
1.0%
Q1 24
1.6%
0.7%
Cash Conversion
BGS
BGS
SHOO
SHOO
Q4 25
3.70×
Q3 25
1.14×
Q2 25
Q1 25
63.17×
-0.46×
Q4 24
2.75×
Q3 24
0.56×
0.01×
Q2 24
2.87×
2.96×
Q1 24
-0.35×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BGS
BGS

Specialty Segment$150.5M34%
Meals Segment$110.0M25%
Spices And Flavor Solutions Segment$101.4M23%
Frozen And Vegetables Segment$77.4M18%

SHOO
SHOO

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons