vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
B&G Foods, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($439.3M vs $304.6M, roughly 1.4× Trip.com Group Ltd). Trip.com Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — 27.8% vs -4.4%, a 32.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
B&G Foods, Inc. is an American branded foods holding company based in Parsippany, New Jersey. The company was formed in 1996 to acquire Bloch & Guggenheimer, a Manhattan-based producer of pickles, relish and condiments which had been founded in 1889.
Trip.com Group Limited is a multinational travel agency headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest online travel service provider in the world.
BGS vs TCOM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $439.3M | $304.6M |
| Net Profit | $-19.1M | $84.6M |
| Gross Margin | 22.5% | 78.8% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | -4.4% | 27.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -356.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.24 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $304.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $424.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $425.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $551.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $461.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $444.6M | $242.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $475.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $835.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-222.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 78.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | 81.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 27.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -40.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.24 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.81 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $60.9M | $10.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | $4.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $470.7M | $23.8B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $36.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 4.30× | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $23.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $470.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $501.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $524.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $755.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $765.0M | $18.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $781.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $36.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $34.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.75× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.67× | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.61× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-64.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-70.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $54.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-64.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-70.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-679.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.17× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGS
| Specialty Segment | $150.5M | 34% |
| Meals Segment | $110.0M | 25% |
| Spices And Flavor Solutions Segment | $101.4M | 23% |
| Frozen And Vegetables Segment | $77.4M | 18% |
TCOM
| Others | $273.0M | 90% |
| Other | $31.6M | 10% |
