vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. (VCTR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

B&G Foods, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($439.3M vs $374.1M, roughly 1.2× Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.). Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 30.2% vs -4.4%, a 34.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.0% vs -4.7%). Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($144.5M vs $-70.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (31.7% CAGR vs -12.8%).

B&G Foods, Inc. is an American branded foods holding company based in Parsippany, New Jersey. The company was formed in 1996 to acquire Bloch & Guggenheimer, a Manhattan-based producer of pickles, relish and condiments which had been founded in 1889.

Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. is an American financial services company headquartered in San Antonio, Texas that focuses on investment management. Outside the US, it also has investment professionals in London, Hong Kong and Singapore.

BGS vs VCTR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BGS
BGS
1.2× larger
BGS
$439.3M
$374.1M
VCTR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VCTR
VCTR
+65.7% gap
VCTR
61.0%
-4.7%
BGS
Higher net margin
VCTR
VCTR
34.5% more per $
VCTR
30.2%
-4.4%
BGS
More free cash flow
VCTR
VCTR
$215.2M more FCF
VCTR
$144.5M
$-70.7M
BGS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VCTR
VCTR
Annualised
VCTR
31.7%
-12.8%
BGS

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Revenue
$439.3M
$374.1M
Net Profit
$-19.1M
$112.8M
Gross Margin
22.5%
Operating Margin
2.5%
40.9%
Net Margin
-4.4%
30.2%
Revenue YoY
-4.7%
61.0%
Net Profit YoY
-356.5%
46.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.24
$1.33

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
$374.1M
Q3 25
$439.3M
$361.2M
Q2 25
$424.4M
$351.2M
Q1 25
$425.4M
$219.6M
Q4 24
$551.6M
$232.4M
Q3 24
$461.1M
$225.6M
Q2 24
$444.6M
$219.6M
Q1 24
$475.2M
$215.9M
Net Profit
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
$112.8M
Q3 25
$-19.1M
$96.5M
Q2 25
$-9.8M
$58.7M
Q1 25
$835.0K
$62.0M
Q4 24
$-222.4M
$76.9M
Q3 24
$7.5M
$82.0M
Q2 24
$3.9M
$74.3M
Q1 24
$-40.2M
$55.7M
Gross Margin
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
Q3 25
22.5%
Q2 25
20.5%
Q1 25
21.2%
Q4 24
21.5%
Q3 24
22.2%
Q2 24
20.7%
Q1 24
22.9%
Operating Margin
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
40.9%
Q3 25
2.5%
38.2%
Q2 25
5.2%
26.8%
Q1 25
8.4%
42.3%
Q4 24
-46.6%
48.1%
Q3 24
11.1%
53.3%
Q2 24
9.9%
50.4%
Q1 24
-3.3%
39.3%
Net Margin
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
30.2%
Q3 25
-4.4%
26.7%
Q2 25
-2.3%
16.7%
Q1 25
0.2%
28.2%
Q4 24
-40.3%
33.1%
Q3 24
1.6%
36.3%
Q2 24
0.9%
33.8%
Q1 24
-8.5%
25.8%
EPS (diluted)
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
$1.33
Q3 25
$-0.24
$1.11
Q2 25
$-0.12
$0.68
Q1 25
$0.01
$0.96
Q4 24
$-2.81
$1.18
Q3 24
$0.09
$1.24
Q2 24
$0.05
$1.12
Q1 24
$-0.51
$0.84

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$60.9M
$163.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.0B
$970.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$470.7M
$2.4B
Total Assets
$2.9B
$4.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
4.30×
0.40×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
$163.7M
Q3 25
$60.9M
$115.7M
Q2 25
$54.1M
$107.9M
Q1 25
$61.2M
$175.6M
Q4 24
$50.6M
$126.7M
Q3 24
$54.7M
$188.2M
Q2 24
$40.3M
$119.0M
Q1 24
$42.5M
$79.9M
Total Debt
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
$970.0M
Q3 25
$2.0B
$972.0M
Q2 25
$2.0B
$965.7M
Q1 25
$2.0B
$964.8M
Q4 24
$2.0B
$963.9M
Q3 24
$2.1B
$982.7M
Q2 24
$2.0B
$981.7M
Q1 24
$2.0B
$990.2M
Stockholders' Equity
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
$2.4B
Q3 25
$470.7M
$2.4B
Q2 25
$501.4M
$2.5B
Q1 25
$513.1M
$1.1B
Q4 24
$524.8M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$755.3M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$765.0M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$781.2M
$1.1B
Total Assets
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
$4.2B
Q3 25
$2.9B
$4.2B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$4.2B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$2.6B
Q4 24
$3.0B
$2.5B
Q3 24
$3.4B
$2.6B
Q2 24
$3.4B
$2.5B
Q1 24
$3.4B
$2.5B
Debt / Equity
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
0.40×
Q3 25
4.30×
0.41×
Q2 25
3.97×
0.39×
Q1 25
3.91×
0.84×
Q4 24
3.85×
0.86×
Q3 24
2.75×
0.84×
Q2 24
2.67×
0.87×
Q1 24
2.61×
0.92×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-64.6M
$145.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-70.7M
$144.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-16.1%
38.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.4%
0.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.29×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$54.8M
$381.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
$145.1M
Q3 25
$-64.6M
$165.9M
Q2 25
$17.8M
$-6.6M
Q1 25
$52.7M
$81.1M
Q4 24
$80.3M
$91.8M
Q3 24
$4.2M
$99.8M
Q2 24
$11.3M
$79.7M
Q1 24
$35.1M
$68.7M
Free Cash Flow
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
$144.5M
Q3 25
$-70.7M
$164.8M
Q2 25
$11.5M
$-7.5M
Q1 25
$42.4M
$79.5M
Q4 24
$71.7M
$91.7M
Q3 24
$-679.0K
$99.4M
Q2 24
$5.2M
$79.5M
Q1 24
$27.5M
$68.2M
FCF Margin
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
38.6%
Q3 25
-16.1%
45.6%
Q2 25
2.7%
-2.1%
Q1 25
10.0%
36.2%
Q4 24
13.0%
39.4%
Q3 24
-0.1%
44.0%
Q2 24
1.2%
36.2%
Q1 24
5.8%
31.6%
Capex Intensity
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
0.2%
Q3 25
1.4%
0.3%
Q2 25
1.5%
0.3%
Q1 25
2.4%
0.7%
Q4 24
1.6%
0.1%
Q3 24
1.0%
0.2%
Q2 24
1.4%
0.1%
Q1 24
1.6%
0.2%
Cash Conversion
BGS
BGS
VCTR
VCTR
Q4 25
1.29×
Q3 25
1.72×
Q2 25
-0.11×
Q1 25
63.17×
1.31×
Q4 24
1.19×
Q3 24
0.56×
1.22×
Q2 24
2.87×
1.07×
Q1 24
1.23×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BGS
BGS

Specialty Segment$150.5M34%
Meals Segment$110.0M25%
Spices And Flavor Solutions Segment$101.4M23%
Frozen And Vegetables Segment$77.4M18%

VCTR
VCTR

Investment Management Fees$301.4M81%
Fund Administration And Distribution Fees$72.8M19%

Related Comparisons