vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BGSF, INC. (BGSF) and Electromed, Inc. (ELMD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BGSF, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.0M vs $18.9M, roughly 1.2× Electromed, Inc.). Electromed, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 14.6% vs -5.3%, a 19.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Electromed, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.3% vs -9.4%). Electromed, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.4M vs $1.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Electromed, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.7% CAGR vs -5.3%).
BGSF Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered workforce solutions firm that provides tailored staffing, talent recruitment, and end-to-end workforce management services. It serves core segments including information technology, healthcare, professional administration, light industrial, and creative industries, catering to small, mid-sized and large enterprise clients across North America.
Electromed, Inc. is a specialized medical device firm developing, manufacturing, and distributing advanced respiratory care products. Its core offerings are high-frequency chest wall oscillation systems that clear airway secretions for patients with cystic fibrosis, COPD and other respiratory conditions, serving U.S. home care and clinical customers.
BGSF vs ELMD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.0M | $18.9M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $2.8M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | 19.2% |
| Net Margin | -5.3% | 14.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | 16.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.2% | 40.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.0M | $18.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.9M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | $17.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $15.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $14.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $13.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-722.0K | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-981.0K | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-804.0K | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-761.0K | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-792.0K | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | 78.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | 78.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 78.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | 78.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.9% | 77.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 78.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | 76.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | 74.8% |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.7% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 13.3% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.6% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.2% | 10.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $13.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.1M | $45.4M |
| Total Assets | $57.8M | $54.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $15.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262 | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226 | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50 | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | $48.1M | $45.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.7M | $44.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $43.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.8M | $43.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.2M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6M | $42.5M |
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | $54.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $53.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $53.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.3M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.1M | $52.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3K | $48.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8K | $52.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.6K | $48.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7M | $3.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | $2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 12.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.0K | $7.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $169.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-83.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $1.3M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 18.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.5% | 30.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | 9.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGSF
| Contract Field Talent | $21.4M | 97% |
| Other | $595.0K | 3% |
ELMD
| Homecare | $17.3M | 91% |
| Other | $1.6M | 9% |
