vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BGSF, INC. (BGSF) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BGSF, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.0M vs $20.2M, roughly 1.1× La Rosa Holdings Corp.). BGSF, INC. runs the higher net margin — -5.3% vs -27.4%, a 22.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, La Rosa Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -9.4%). Over the past eight quarters, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (72.5% CAGR vs -5.3%).
BGSF Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered workforce solutions firm that provides tailored staffing, talent recruitment, and end-to-end workforce management services. It serves core segments including information technology, healthcare, professional administration, light industrial, and creative industries, catering to small, mid-sized and large enterprise clients across North America.
V. La Rosa and Sons Macaroni Company was founded in 1914 by Vincenzo La Rosa, a Sicilian immigrant. The company eventually became one of the largest regional brands in the United States producing over 40 varieties of pasta.
BGSF vs LRHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.0M | $20.2M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | 8.4% |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | -24.7% |
| Net Margin | -5.3% | -27.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.2% | -125.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $-5.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.9M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-722.0K | $-95.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-981.0K | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-804.0K | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-761.0K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-792.0K | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.7% | -17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | -9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | -35.0% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.6% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | 337.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | -546.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | -28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.2% | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $-5.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $15.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $-5.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $28.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $-16.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-12.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $642.8K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.1M | $1.6M |
| Total Assets | $57.8M | $21.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.41× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262 | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226 | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50 | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $642.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $644.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $645.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $647.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $649.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $650.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $652.4K |
| Q4 25 | $48.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.8M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.2M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6M | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.3M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.1M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3K | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8K | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.6K | $16.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7M | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $-591.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $-803.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4M | $-538.3K |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGSF
| Contract Field Talent | $21.4M | 97% |
| Other | $595.0K | 3% |
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
