vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BGSF, INC. (BGSF) and TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BGSF, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.0M vs $20.4M, roughly 1.1× TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.). TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 65.0% vs -5.3%, a 70.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.7% vs -9.4%). Over the past eight quarters, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.1% CAGR vs -5.3%).
BGSF Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered workforce solutions firm that provides tailored staffing, talent recruitment, and end-to-end workforce management services. It serves core segments including information technology, healthcare, professional administration, light industrial, and creative industries, catering to small, mid-sized and large enterprise clients across North America.
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust managed by global alternative asset firm TPG. It primarily invests in residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, performing and non-performing mortgage loans, and other credit-linked real estate assets, with its core market being the United States. It generates returns via net interest income from holdings and strategic asset disposition gains.
BGSF vs MITT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.0M | $20.4M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $13.3M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | 67.1% |
| Net Margin | -5.3% | 65.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.2% | -7.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.0M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.9M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-722.0K | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-981.0K | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-804.0K | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-761.0K | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-792.0K | $20.9M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | 67.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 54.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.7% | 76.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 65.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.6% | 102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 82.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | 111.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.2% | 121.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $57.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.1M | $560.7M |
| Total Assets | $57.8M | $8.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $115.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262 | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226 | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50 | $100.3M |
| Q4 25 | $48.1M | $560.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.7M | $559.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $536.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.8M | $543.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | $543.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | $540.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.2M | $533.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6M | $539.6M |
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.3M | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.1M | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3K | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8K | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.6K | $6.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7M | $59.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $59.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4M | $12.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.91× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGSF
| Contract Field Talent | $21.4M | 97% |
| Other | $595.0K | 3% |
MITT
Segment breakdown not available.
