vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BGSF, INC. (BGSF) and NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (NEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.6M vs $22.0M, roughly 1.1× BGSF, INC.). BGSF, INC. runs the higher net margin — -5.3% vs -677.3%, a 672.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs -9.4%). Over the past eight quarters, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP's revenue compounded faster (8.9% CAGR vs -5.3%).
BGSF Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered workforce solutions firm that provides tailored staffing, talent recruitment, and end-to-end workforce management services. It serves core segments including information technology, healthcare, professional administration, light industrial, and creative industries, catering to small, mid-sized and large enterprise clients across North America.
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership is a real estate investment entity that owns, operates and manages residential and commercial properties primarily across the U.S. New England region. Its core assets include multifamily apartments, mixed-use properties and small commercial spaces, serving tenants across Massachusetts, New Hampshire and adjacent states, delivering steady returns to unitholders via rental income and property value growth.
BGSF vs NEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.0M | $23.6M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | 14.0% |
| Net Margin | -5.3% | -677.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.2% | -133.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.0M | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.9M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $19.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $-521.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-722.0K | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-981.0K | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-804.0K | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-761.0K | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-792.0K | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.7% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 32.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | -677.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.6% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.2% | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $26.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $531.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.1M | — |
| Total Assets | $57.8M | $505.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262 | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226 | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50 | $28.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $531.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $514.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $514.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $407.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $408.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $409.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $410.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $410.7M |
| Q4 25 | $48.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | $505.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $492.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $494.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.3M | $385.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.1M | $393.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3K | $387.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8K | $383.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.6K | $381.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7M | $27.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $12.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4M | $6.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGSF
| Contract Field Talent | $21.4M | 97% |
| Other | $595.0K | 3% |
NEN
Segment breakdown not available.
