vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BGSF, INC. (BGSF) and OP Bancorp (OPBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OP Bancorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.3M vs $22.0M, roughly 1.1× BGSF, INC.). On growth, OP Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs -9.4%). OP Bancorp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($23.4M vs $1.7M). Over the past eight quarters, OP Bancorp's revenue compounded faster (11.4% CAGR vs -5.3%).
BGSF Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered workforce solutions firm that provides tailored staffing, talent recruitment, and end-to-end workforce management services. It serves core segments including information technology, healthcare, professional administration, light industrial, and creative industries, catering to small, mid-sized and large enterprise clients across North America.
OP Bancorp is the bank holding company for Open Bank, a community-oriented commercial bank headquartered in California, United States. It provides a full range of banking solutions including deposit accounts, commercial real estate loans, small business financing, and consumer lending products, primarily catering to small and medium-sized enterprises, local immigrant communities, and retail clients across Southern California.
BGSF vs OPBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.0M | $24.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | 39.2% |
| Net Margin | -5.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.0M | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.9M | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | $23.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $22.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-722.0K | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-981.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-804.0K | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-761.0K | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-792.0K | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | 39.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | 35.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 34.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.7% | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 37.1% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.6% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 25.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.2% | 26.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $167.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.1M | $227.9M |
| Total Assets | $57.8M | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $167.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $166.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $205.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $198.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | $134.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262 | $166.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226 | $127.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50 | $139.2M |
| Q4 25 | $48.1M | $227.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.7M | $221.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $213.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.8M | $210.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | $203.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.2M | $195.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6M | $194.7M |
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3K | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8K | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.6K | $2.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7M | $26.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | $23.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 96.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 11.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.0K | $43.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4M | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $23.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $29.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 96.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | 95.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | -32.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 139.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | 61.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.5% | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.90× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGSF
| Contract Field Talent | $21.4M | 97% |
| Other | $595.0K | 3% |
OPBK
Segment breakdown not available.