vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BGSF, INC. (BGSF) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BGSF, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.0M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.6× Venus Concept Inc.). BGSF, INC. runs the higher net margin — -5.3% vs -163.8%, a 158.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Venus Concept Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.2% vs -9.4%). BGSF, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.7M vs $-4.9M). Over the past eight quarters, BGSF, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-5.3% CAGR vs -12.8%).
BGSF Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered workforce solutions firm that provides tailored staffing, talent recruitment, and end-to-end workforce management services. It serves core segments including information technology, healthcare, professional administration, light industrial, and creative industries, catering to small, mid-sized and large enterprise clients across North America.
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
BGSF vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.0M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | -5.3% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.2% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.9M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-722.0K | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-981.0K | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-804.0K | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-761.0K | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-792.0K | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.9% | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.7% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.6% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.2% | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.1M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $57.8M | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262 | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226 | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50 | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $48.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.7M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6M | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.3M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.1M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3K | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8K | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.6K | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.0K | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.5% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 0.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGSF
| Contract Field Talent | $21.4M | 97% |
| Other | $595.0K | 3% |
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |